Davis Contractors Ltd v Fareham Urban District Council [1956] UKHL 3 is an English contract law case, concerning the frustration of an agreement.

Facts

Davis Contractors agreed with Fareham UDC to build 78 houses over eight months for £92,425. It ended up taking 22 months because Davis was short of labour and materials and cost £115,223. Davis submitted the contract was frustrated and void and therefore they were entitled to quantum meruit for the value of work done.

Davis Contractors Ltd v Fareham UDC

Judgment

The House of Lords held that although the performance of the contract had become more onerous, it was not frustrated. Lord Reid argued that saying frustration was an implied term was fanciful because people do not write about unforeseeable events. Instead, he wrote the following:

Davis Contractors Ltd v Fareham UDC

Lord Radcliffe concurred with the result:

Davis Contractors Ltd v Fareham UDC

Another argument that failed was that an express term was incorporated that the agreed price was binding only if there were in fact adequate supplies of labour and materials.

Australian law

Lord Radcliffe's test was approved by the High Court of Australia in Codelfa Construction Pty Ltd v State Rail Authority of NSW.

See also

English contract law

Frustration in English law

References

House of Lords cases

1956 in case law

1956 in British law

Fareham

English frustration case law