[Footnote 142: See Streit in R.G. X. (1903), pp. 399-417.]
[Footnote 143: See Albrecht in Z.V. I. (1907), pp. 56-112.]
Hall, §§ 4 and 38*--Westlake, I. pp. 22-24--Lawrence, § 39--Phillimore, I. 75-82--Twiss, I. §§ 22-36--Taylor, §§ 134-139--Wheaton, §§ 34-36--Moore, I. § 14--Bluntschli, § 78--Hartmann, § 9--Heffter, §§ 19 and 22--Holtzendorff in Holtzendorff, II. pp. 98-117--Gareis, § 15--Liszt, § 6--Ullmann, § 26--Bonfils, Nos. 176-187--Despagnet, Nos. 130-136--Mérignhac, II. pp. 180-220--Pradier-Fodéré, I. Nos. 94-108--Nys, I. pp. 364-366--Rivier, I. § 4--Calvo, I. §§ 62-65--Fiore, I. § 341, and Code, Nos. 111-118--Martens, I. §§ 60-61--Pillet in R.G. II. (1895), pp. 583-608--Heilborn, "Das völkerrechtliche Protectorat" (1891)--Engelhardt, "Les Protectorats, &c." (1896)--Gairal, "Le protectorat international" (1896)--Despagnet, "Essai sur les protectorats" (1896)--Boghitchévitch, "Halbsouveränität" (1903).
§ 92. Legally and materially different from suzerainty is the relation of protectorate between two States. It happens that a weak State surrenders itself by treaty into the protection of a strong and mighty State in such a way that it transfers the management[144] of all its more important[145] international affairs to the protecting State. Through such treaty an international union is called into existence between the two States, and the relation between them is called protectorate. The protecting State is internationally the superior of the protected State, the latter has with the loss of the management of its more important international affairs lost its full sovereignty and is henceforth only a half-Sovereign State. Protectorate is, however, a conception which, just like suzerainty, lacks exact juristic precision,[146] as its real meaning depends very much upon the special case. Generally speaking, protectorate may, again like suzerainty, be called _a kind of international guardianship_.
[Footnote 144: A treaty of protectorate must not be confounded with a treaty of protection in which one or more strong States promise to protect a weak State without absorbing the international relations of the latter.]
[Footnote 145: That the admittance of Consuls belongs to these affairs became apparent in 1906, when Russia, after some hesitation, finally agreed upon Japan, and not Korea, granting the _exequatur_ to the Consul-general appointed by Russia for Korea, which was then a State under Japanese protectorate. See below, § 427.]
