[4] _"So viel uns bekannt"_--J. B. Heinrich, "Dogma," in Wetzer and Welte's (Catholic) _Kirchenlexikon_.
[5] See G. Hoffmann, _Fides implicita_, vol. i. (1903), pp. 82, &c.; and cf. the 17th-century creed of Bishop Mogilas adopted by the whole Greek Church.
[6] A. Schweizer's _Protestant Central Dogmas_ (1854-1856) was an historical study of Reformed, i.e. Calvinist-Zwinglian theology.
[7] "Dogma," &c., in Wetzer and Welte's _Kirchenlexikon_.
[8] The distinction of pure and mixed articles--those of revelation and those taught in common by revelation and natural theology--reappears in modern Roman Catholic theology as a distinction between pure and mixed _dogmas_.
[9] Luther's Schmalkalden Articles and the Thirty-Nine Articles of the Church of England should also be mentioned.
[11] Early Protestantism lived too much in the thought of justification to mark out the boundaries of creed with this scholastic precision.
[12] _Loci communes_ (1610-1622), on Interpretation of Sacred Scripture, ix. 149.
[13] Three writers mentioned in Wetzer's and Welte's _Kirchenlexikon_.
[14] Also quoted as having appeared 1745, but that is an error; he quotes F. A. Blau, _On the Rule of Faith_ (Mainz, 1780). See further the sketch of Chrismann in _Allgemeine deutsche Biographie_, supplement.
[15] G. Perrone, e.g. _De immaculato B. V. Mariae conceptu; an dogmatico decreto definiri possit?_ (1847).
[16] These divisions and subdivisions are not numbered in the Decrees, as for clearness they have been numbered above.
[17] Three zones apparently (1) the church's formal decrees, (2) the church's general teaching, (3) points of revelation which the church may not yet have overtaken. _Per contra_, much that was only "implicit" in the deposit of faith has become "explicit" in dogma. (The reader must note that "implicit" is used here in a different sense from that referred to earlier in this article. Here, church dogma has explicated what was implicit in revelation. There, the unlearned accept by _implication_, i.e. by a general acceptance of church belief and teaching, dogmas they perhaps have never heard of. Both usages are current in Roman Catholic theology.)
[18] Or the view of D. Schenkel, that dogma is what is enforced by civil and criminal law.