Chapter XV.—In Memory There are

Also Images of Things Which are Absent.

23. But whether by images or no, who can well

affirm? For I name a stone, I name the sun, and the things

themselves are not present to my senses, but their images are near

to my memory. I name some pain of the body, yet it is not present

when there is no pain; yet if its image were not in my memory, I

should be ignorant what to say concerning it, nor in arguing be

able to distinguish it from pleasure. I name bodily health when

sound in body; the thing itself is indeed present with me, but

unless its image also were in my memory, I could by no means call

to mind what the sound of this name signified. Nor would sick

people know, when health was named, what was said, unless the same

image were retained by the power of memory, although the thing

itself were absent from the body. I name numbers whereby we

enumerate; and not their images, but they themselves are in my

memory. I name the image of the sun, and this, too, is in my

memory. For I do not recall the image of that image, but itself, for the image itself is present when I remember it. I name memory, and I know what I name. But where do I know it, except in the memory itself? Is it also present to itself by its image, and not by itself?

Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers: Series I/Volume I/Confessions/Book X/Chapter 15