4. A mortgagee in a chattel mortgage held the same for ten days after the delivery of the mortgage and then recorded it. In the meantime a judgment was recovered against the mortgagor, execution issued and a levy made upon the goods and chattels named in the mortgage. Which has priority?

5. S agreed to take the automobile of T to a shop to be repaired and to return it after it was repaired. He took it to the shop, but failed to return it. It was later destroyed by fire while in the shop, and T sued S because of his failure to return the automobile. Was he liable?

The New Jersey Law Journal Jan. 1922 — Part 35

6. A purchased an automobile from an infant and sold it to B in good faith for value, neither A nor B having notice of the infancy of A's vendor. Was it a valid sale?

The New Jersey Law Journal Jan. 1922 — Part 35

7. R was indebted to S and the latter started a suit to recover the amount due. Thereupon G agreed with S that if he would discontinue his suit and wait for three months before again suing, he would be responsible for the debt. This was done. At the end of the three months was G liable?

The New Jersey Law Journal Jan. 1922 — Part 35

8. L agreed to do certain work, part of it to be done on Sunday. T subsequently agreed to pay L for such work. Was he liable?

9. An agent received the instructions of his principal, knowing that in order to carry them out he would have to commit a nuisance, and did actually commit such nuisance. The person injured sued the agent. Was he liable?

10. The partnership accounts between D and M were unsettled, although they had dissolved partnership. D alone could settle them, but refused to do so. What kind of action could M institute against D?

11. Smith purchased a horse from Jones, giving him in payment a check on a bank which he (Smith) had had certified. Smith having learned that Jones had no title to the horse stopped payment on the check. Jones sued the bank which answered, setting up want of consideration for the check. Could it do so?

12. A died January 1, 1915, leaving a last will wherein he bequeathed $5,000 to his son, John, then aged 18, and $5,000 to the A hospital, and the residue of his estate to his daughter, Jane. The legacies remaining unpaid on January 1, 1918, John and the hospital sued the executors for them, claiming also interest. From what date should interest be allowed, if at all?