Huntsmen, Watchmen, Villagers, Cadgers, &c., &c.

Corinthian Kate Miss M. Cooke. Hon. Mrs. Gadabout Mrs. Clarke. Patty Primrose Miss Carr. Mary Miss Cramer. Hon. Mrs. Trifle Miss Grosette. Fortune Teller Mrs. Grosette. Mrs. Allright Miss H. Grosette. African Sal Miss Black.

The True History of Tom and Jerry — Part 76

Country Lasses, Ladies at Almack’s in the West, &c., &c.; Prospectus of Scenery, &c., &c., as before.

The True History of Tom and Jerry — Part 76

To conclude with the Romantic Melo-drama of

The True History of Tom and Jerry — Part 76

Valentine Mr. Power. Orson Mr. S. Chapman.

Creasy, Printer, _Gazette Office_, Brighton.

The notoriety which Tom and Jerry obtained in England, became the topic of conversation amongst our Gallic neighbours--nay, it crept so much into favour with the gay folks of Paris, LIFE IN LONDON was speedily translated into French, under the title of “The Diorama; or, Picturesque Rambles in London--containing the most faithful _Notices of the Character, Manners, and Customs of the English Nation_, in the various classes of Society. By M. S----.” The translation had a most extensive circulation in France.

The reception of Tom and Jerry was equally flattering--notwithstanding the great prejudices that had previously existed against it--in Dublin. Mr. Wrench, from the Adelphi Theatre, was specially engaged to play the part of Corinthian Tom. The first seven nights produced £1300; and the house, on Mr. Wrench’s benefit night, held £345.

The great success of “Life in London,” in its dramatic form in the Irish capital lead up to the publication of:--

“REAL LIFE IN IRELAND; or, the Day and Night Scenes, Rovings, Rambles, and Sprees, Bulls, Blunders, Bodderation, and Blarney of Brian Born, Esq., and his elegant friend _Sir Shawn O’Dogherty_. 1829. Coloured plates.”

In which the pictorial style of the Brothers Cruikshank was imitated from an Hibernian point of view and colouring.

At both the Theatres in Edinburgh, Tom and Jerry attracted crowded audiences, according to the Editor of the _Edinburgh Dramatic Review_, who states thus:--

“At length the public of Edinburgh had opportunity of judging of the merits of the above celebrated Extravaganza. From the general tendency of the remarks which appeared in the newspapers, we were led to suppose that this piece consisted of indecency and gross vulgarity. From what we heard reported as to the numerous indelicacies which this sketch of Fun, Frolic, Fashion, and Flash contained, we were afraid that its success with our sober citizens would have been precarious; but, we are happy to say, that the applause which was bestowed on it by the unprecedentedly numerous assemblage on Saturday evening, January 25, 1823, which crowded the Caledonian Theatre, is a sufficient answer to the chimerical doubts which were industriously circulated against its propriety. There is nothing, as we before remarked, associated with disgust or offence. There is neither one word, action, or situation, in the whole course of the piece, that can possibly raise a blush, or offend the most fastidious moralist!”