Unstable relics with lifetime longer than the age of the Universe could be the dark matter today. Electrons, photons and neutrinos are a natural outcome of their decay and could be searched for in cosmic rays and in $\gamma$-ray and neutrino detectors. I compare the sensitivities of these three types of searches to the mass and lifetime of a generic unstable particle. I show that if the relics constitute our galactic halo and their branching ratios into electron-positrons, photons and neutrinos are comparable, neutrino searches would probe the longest lifetimes for masses $\simge 40 \TeV$, while electron-positron searches would be better but more uncertain for lighter particles. If instead the relics are not clustered in our halo, neutrinos are more sensitive a probe than $\gamma$-rays for masses $\simge 700 \GeV$. A $ 1 \sqkm $ neutrino telescope should be able to explore lifetimes up to $ \sim 10^{ 30} \sec $ while searching for neutrinos from unstable particles above the atmospheric background.
Categories: hep-ph