The Martyrs whom Justin mentions in his Own Work.

1. same man, before his conflict, mentions in his first Apology others that suffered martyrdom before him, and most fittingly records the following events.

Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers: Series II/Volume I/Church History of Eusebius/Book IV/Chapter 17

2. He writes thus: “A certain woman lived with a

dissolute husband; she herself, too, having formerly been of the same

character. But when she came to the knowledge of the teachings of

Christ, she became temperate, and endeavored to persuade her husband

likewise to be temperate, repeating the teachings, and declaring the

punishment in eternal fire which shall come upon those who do not live

temperately and conformably to right reason.

Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers: Series II/Volume I/Church History of Eusebius/Book IV/Chapter 17

3. But he, continuing in the

same excesses, alienated his wife by his conduct. For she finally, thinking it wrong to live as a wife with a man who, contrary to the law of nature and right, sought every possible means of pleasure, desired to be divorced from him.

Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers: Series II/Volume I/Church History of Eusebius/Book IV/Chapter 17

4. And when she was earnestly

entreated by her friends, who counseled her still to remain with him, on the ground that her husband might some time give hope of amendment, she did violence to herself and remained.

5. But when her husband had gone

to Alexandria, and was reported to be conducting himself still worse, she—in order that she might not, by continuing in wedlock, and by sharing his board and bed, become a partaker in his lawlessness and impiety—gave him what we call a bill of divorce and left him.

6. But her noble and excellent

husband,—instead of rejoicing, as he ought to have done, that she

had given up those actions which she had formerly recklessly committed

with the servants and hirelings, when she delighted in drunkenness and

in every vice, and that she desired him likewise to give them

up,—when she had gone from him contrary to his wish, brought an

accusation concerning her, declaring that she was a

Christian.

7. And she petitioned you, the

emperor, that she might be permitted first to set her affairs in order, and afterwards, after the settlement of her affairs, to make her defense against the accusation. And this you granted.

8. But he who had once been her

husband, being no longer able to prosecute her, directed his attacks

against a certain Ptolemæus, who had

been her teacher in the doctrines of Christianity, and whom Urbicius had punished. Against him he proceeded in the following manner:

9. “He persuaded a

centurion who was his friend to cast Ptolemæus into prison, and to

take him and ask him this only: whether he were a Christian? And when

Ptolemæus, who was a lover of truth, and not of a deceitful and

false disposition, confessed that he was a Christian, the centurion

bound him and punished him for a long time in the prison.

10. And finally, when the man

was brought before Urbicius he was likewise asked this question only: whether he were a Christian? And again, conscious of the benefits which he enjoyed through the teaching of Christ, he confessed his schooling in divine virtue.

11. For whoever denies that he

is a Christian, either denies because he despises Christianity, or he

avoids confession because he is conscious that he is unworthy and an

alien to it; neither of which is the case with the true

Christian.

12. And when Urbicius commanded

that he be led away to punishment, a certain Lucius, who was also a Christian, seeing judgment so unjustly passed, said to Urbicius, ‘Why have you punished this man who is not an adulterer, nor a fornicator, nor a murderer, nor a thief, nor a robber, nor has been convicted of committing any crime at all, but has confessed that he bears the name of Christian? You do not judge, O Urbicius, in a manner befitting the Emperor Pius, or the philosophical son of Cæsar, or the sacred senate.’

13. And without making any other

reply, he said to Lucius, ‘Thou also seemest to me to be such an

one.’ And when Lucius said, ‘Certainly,’ he again

commanded that he too should be led away to punishment. But he

professed his thanks, for he was liberated, he added, from such wicked

rulers and was going to the good Father and King, God. And still a

third having come forward was condemned to be

punished.”

14. To this, Justin fittingly

and consistently adds the words which we quoted above, saying, “I, too, therefore expect to be plotted against by some one of those whom I have named,” &c.

Footnotes