With the death anniversary of Patrice Lumumba and Gbagbo's Pan-Africanist speech, many started likening both men to the fathers of Pan-Africanism. It happens that Laurent Gbagbo himself ( in an interview with the Figaro on 12/27/2010 [Fr]), compared himself to Robert Mugabe, forgetting nonetheless that before firing the dictator, Robert Mugabe was the hero of the independence of his country Zimbabwe (before him, Rhodesia lived under the rule of Ian Smith's apartheid). Mugabe started by driving out the dictator since the Lancaster agreements he had negotiated stipulated an agrarian reform and Mugabe reckoned that the British had to finance this reform; however the British didn't see things the same way. And it is because of this past that very few Africans risk criticizing Robert Mugabe. Therefore, Pan-Africanism is a notion with a peculiar historical context and those who call themselves Pan-Africanists like to think that they are positioning themselves against the former colonial powers. The Ivorian politician Venance Konan responds in an article entitled Dear “Françafrique” (France-Africa)! [Fr] on his blog to his “Pan-Africanists”. : Cette mentalité anime encore bon nombre d’intellectuels africains et panafricanistes installés bien au chaud (façon de parler en ce moment) en France.Pour toute chose, il faut chercher le coupable ailleurs. Et pour eux, tout ce qui arrive de négatif en Afrique est le fait de la France ou de son excroissance, la Françafrique. C’est elle, notre sorcier. Ainsi, la crise post-électorale qui secoue en ce moment la Côte d’Ivoire serait la faute à la France ou à la Françafrique. Chère Françafrique ! Que serions-nous devenus, nous intellectuels africains et panafricanistes, si tu n’avais pas existé pour nous dédouaner de toute responsabilité dans nos malheurs. Others on the internet have also reacted to Gbagbo's positioning [Fr- all links]: Many Africans were shocked by these articles and started wondering if this dichotomy between “Pan-Africanism and former colonial powers” is really the only alternative to this debate. Yes, Africa's future is taking place in Ivory Coast but some have become schizophrenic. MBKM wrote in Crisis in Côte d’Ivoire : when France turns Africans into schizophrenics [Fr] Cet état de chose fait bizarrement de Laurent Gbagbo, pourtant le fossoyeur de la démocratie ivoirienne, l’incarnation du patriotisme, du nationalisme, de la résistance face à un Ouattara soupçonné d’être le « chouchou » d’une Françafrique que beaucoup d’Africains tiennent en horreur. Reconnaissons-le. Nous naviguons là en plein autisme. As for Côte d’Ivoire coming out of crisis, many think that Africa cannot afford to give “jurisdiction to Gbagbo” [Fr]” and can afford it even less in 2011 since there are scheduled elections in: RCA, Cameroon, Niger, Zimbabwe, Benin, Djibouti, Nigeria, Madagascar, Chad, DRC, and Angola. It's not a secret for anyone and especially not for Africans that Africa is courted for its natural resources and lands (comparing a map of ethical conflicts with one of natural resources would be interesting). It's not a secret for anyone and especially not for Africans that the politics and institutions of Washington don't necessarily have raising Africa out of poverty as a first priority. Natural resources in Africa via Ray Mikkleson and Cara Wurtz at U. of Omaha The Africans whose parents participated in the decolonization, whose parents admired Patrice Lumumba, whose parents supported Sékou Touré before he became insane are disappointed by politicians who use and compare themselves to Patrice Lumumba in order to remain in power. Patrice Lumumba wasn't ethnicist (Patrice Lumumba's speech, Prime minister and minister of national security of the Democratic Republic of Congo, at the ceremony of Independance in Leopoldille, June 30th 1960) [Fr] Patrice Lumumba didn't stay 10 years in power even though he was only elected for 5. Laurent Gbagbo has neither Thomas Sankara's implacability nor can he be compared to Patrice Lumumba. In fact, the debate has slightly evolved as read in this article by Kofi Alouda: Ivorian Crisis: the amalgam with the hypothetical “déjà vu” has blurred the interpretation of facts of some sincere democrats [Fr]. In the beginning, Laurent Gbagbo could certainly have passed for a revolutionary, for that matter many people went down to the streets to support him. In addition, he was the historical opponent, just like A. Wade of Senegal (apparently, this hasn't really turn out well for them).