Mr. MENENDEZ. Mr. Speaker, on May 21 I joined a Congressional panel

on U.S. policy options and prospects for change in Iran. The panel

discussed President Khatami's election and Iran's efforts to acquire

weapons of mass destruction. I am certain that my colleagues will join

me in recognizing the threat that Iran would pose to the U.S. and the

region if it is successful in acquiring nuclear weapons.

I have introduced legislation (H.R. 3743) to thwart Iran's

development of nuclear weapons. The Iran Nuclear Proliferation

Prevention Act of 1998 will require the withholding of U.S. proportional voluntary assistance to the International Atomic Energy Agency for programs and projects of the Agency in Iran. The bill seeks to limit assistance from the Agency for the completion of the Bushehr Nuclear Power Plant in Iran. It is believed that the completion of the Bushehr plant will result in the transfer of civilian nuclear technology and training that could help to advance Iran's nuclear weapons program.

Prospects for Change in Iran

Firmness is the only means of deterring Khatami and the clerical

regime from their quest for an arsenal of weapons of mass destruction. We must make it clear, especially now when the mullahs may well be on their last legs, that we support the kind of progress towards democracy and genuine reform promised by the democratic opposition.

Prospects for Change in Iran

Mr. Speaker, I am submitting my remarks to the panel on this matter

to be printed in the Congressional Record:

Prospects for Change in Iran

I want to thank the National Council of Resistance of Iran

for organizing this event and for their ongoing efforts to

focus attention on the rogue regime that continues to reside

in Tehran under President Khatami.

Each of us here today, looks forward to the day when Iran

rejoins the community of democratic nations. However, today

is not that day. President Khatami, while slightly more

moderate than his predecessor will not or cannot overcome the

political forces in Iran which avidly pursue the development

of weapons of mass destruction and continue support for

terrorism.

We have heard many disturbing facts and figures, about

Iranian human rights violations, about chaos and conflict

within the country, and about Iran's support of international

terrorist organizations, such as Hizballah, Hamas and the

Palestine Islamic Jihad, all of which are responsible for

terrorist attacks on Israel. Each of these facts reflects the

ruling regime's status as a rogue state, which considers

itself above international law, with little respect for human

life, let alone human rights. The prospect of that regime

armed with nuclear weapons is not a pleasant one.

Just this week, Russia and Iran announced that over the

strong objections of the U.S. and Israel, that they would be

stepping up their cooperation in the field of nuclear

technology. In fact, Iran's Atomic Energy Minister made it

clear that the two countries are considering further

cooperation beyond their current project to build a nuclear

power plant in Iran.

To give you a little background, Iran has been seeking

nuclear power since the early 1970's, when the Shah attempted

to build two reactors in Bushehr. The project, begun by a

German company in 1974, was suspended following the 1979

Revolution. The clerical regime's efforts to obtain nuclear

capability began in earnest in the midst of the Iran-Iraq

War, in 1985, and in February of this year, Tehran announced

its intention to construct two Russian reactors in Bushehr.

The question remains, why has Iran devoted such colossal

resources, money and effort to build the Bushehr power plant. Iran claims to need the Bushehr nuclear reactors to supply energy to the country. Yet, Iran's immense oil and natural gas reserves call into question its motives for constructing expensive nuclear reactors. Iran has 9.3 percent of the world's oil reserves and natural gas reserves, second only to Russia. Clearly, Iran does not need additional energy sources, nor is nuclear energy an economic choice for Iran. So what is the motive?

It should not be a revelation to anyone that Iran is

seeking to acquire nuclear weapons.

In 1991, Ayatollah Mohajerani, one of Rafsanjani's

deputies, clarified the need to obtain nuclear weapons.

"Since the enemy has nuclear facilities," he said, "Islamic countries must be armed with the same capacity."