Chapter IX.

His warning to the Galatians a warning to all.

Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers: Series II/Volume XI/The Commonitory of Vincent of Lerins/Chapter 9

[24.] , possibly, this

warning was intended for the Galatians only. Be it so; then those other

exhortations which follow in the same Epistle were intended for the

Galatians only, such as, “If we live in the Spirit, let us also

walk in the Spirit; let us not be desirous of vain glory, provoking one

another, envying one another,” etc.; which alternative if it be absurd, and the injunctions were meant equally for all, then it follows, that as these injunctions which relate to morals, so those warnings which relate to faith are meant equally for all; and just as it is unlawful for all to provoke one another, or to envy one another, so, likewise, it is unlawful for all to receive any other Gospel than that which the Catholic Church preaches everywhere.

Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers: Series II/Volume XI/The Commonitory of Vincent of Lerins/Chapter 9

[25.] Or perhaps the anathema pronounced on any

one who should preach another Gospel than that which had been preached

was meant for those times, not for the present. Then, also, the

exhortation, “Walk in the Spirit and ye shall not fulfil the lust

of the flesh,” was meant for those

times, not for the present. But if it be both impious and pernicious to

believe this, then it follows necessarily, that as these injunctions

are to be observed by all ages, so those warnings also which forbid

alteration of the faith are warnings intended for all ages. To preach

any doctrine therefore to Catholic Christians other than what they have

received never was lawful, never is lawful, never will be lawful: and

to anathematize those who preach anything other than what has once been

received, always was a duty, always is a duty, always will be a

duty.

Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers: Series II/Volume XI/The Commonitory of Vincent of Lerins/Chapter 9

[26.] Which being the case, is there any one

either so audacious as to preach any other doctrine than that which the

Church preaches, or so inconstant as to receive any other doctrine than

that which he has received from the Church? That elect vessel, that

teacher of the Gentiles, that trumpet of the apostles, that preacher

whose commission was to the whole earth, that man who was caught up to

heaven, cries and cries again in his Epistles to

all, always, in all places, “If any man preach any new doctrine, let him be accursed.” On the other hand, an ephemeral, moribund set of frogs, fleas, and flies, such as the Pelagians, call out in opposition, and that to Catholics, “Take our word, follow our lead, accept our exposition, condemn what you used to hold, hold what you used to condemn, cast aside the ancient faith, the institutes of your fathers, the trusts left for you by your ancestors and receive instead,—what? I tremble to utter it: for it is so full of arrogance and self-conceit, that it seems to me that not only to affirm it, but even to refute it, cannot be done without guilt in some sort.

Footnotes