If we use circumstances and phenomenon in place of antecedents and consequent, then one symbolization may be made to stand for ascertaining either the invariable antecedent, or the invariable consequent.

1. A B C D P₁ 2. A D E F P₂ 3. A L M N P₃ 4. A O P Q P₄ 5. O P Q ― 6. L M N ― 7. D E F ― 8. B C D ―

A Class Room Logic — Part 220

It is obvious that the first, second, third and fourth groups of instances illustrate the principle of Agreement; whereas the first and eighth, the second and seventh, the third and sixth, and the fourth and fifth illustrate in each case, the principle of Difference.

A Class Room Logic — Part 220

(3) Concrete Examples illustrating Joint Method.

A Class Room Logic — Part 220

1. Insufficient work, } Lack of interest, } Much whispering. _Seated near a friend._ }

2. More work, } Lack of interest, } Much whispering. _Seated near a friend._ }

3. More work, } More interest, } Much whispering. _Seated near a friend._ }

4. More work, } More interest, } Not much whispering. _Not seated near a friend._ }

5. More work, } Lack of interest, } Not much whispering. _Not seated near a friend._ }

6. Insufficient work, } Lack of interest, } Not much whispering. _Not seated near a friend._ }

From this it may be concluded that the undue amount of whispering is caused by seating particular friends near each other.

1. Long lesson, } Faulty assignment of lesson, } Poor recitation. _Fear of teacher._ }

2. Lesson made shorter, } Faulty assignment of lesson, } Poor recitation. _Fear of teacher._ }

3. Lesson made shorter, } A more careful assignment, } Poor recitation. _Fear of teacher._ }

4. Lesson made shorter, } A more careful assignment, } Good recitation. _Removal of fear of teacher._ }

5. Lesson made shorter, } Faulty assignment, } Good recitation. _No fear of teacher._ }

6. Lesson long, } Faulty assignment, } Good recitation. _No fear of teacher._ }

Fear of teacher is the cause of the poor recitation.

Being a combination of Agreement and Difference the Joint Method possesses the characteristics of _each_, though more or less modified. The distinguishing marks may be summarized as follows:

(1) Of the first group of instances: (1) The phenomenon must always occur, (2) One antecedent must be invariable, (3) The other antecedents must be more or less variable.

(2) Of the second group of instances: (1) The phenomenon must never occur, (2) One antecedent must be variable, (3) The other antecedents must be more or less invariable.