In all these cases, too, the pupil would be misled if we aroused first a sense of the inadequacy of counting, adding, and objective division, an awareness of the difficulties which the multiplication and division tables and nines device and area theorem relieve. The displaced processes are admirable and no unnecessary fault should be found with them, and they are _not_ inadequate until the shorter ways have been learned.

One false inference about the problem-attitude is that the pupil should always understand the aim or issue before beginning to form the bonds which give the method or process that provides the solution. On the contrary, he will often get the process more easily and value it more highly if he is taught what it is _for_ gradually while he is learning it. The system of decimal notation, for example, may better be taken first as a mere fact, just as we teach a child to talk without trying first to have him understand the value of verbal intercourse, or to keep clean without trying first to have him understand the bacteriological consequences of filth.

The Psychology of Arithmetic — Part 165

A second inference--that the pupil should always be taught to care about an issue and crave a process for managing it before beginning to learn the process--is equally false. On the contrary, the best way to become interested in certain issues and the ways of handling them is to learn the process--even to learn it by sheer habituation--and then note what it does for us. Such is the case with ".1666-2/3 × = divide by 6," ".333-1/3 × = divide by 3," "multiply by .875 = divide the number by 8 and subtract the quotient from the number."

The Psychology of Arithmetic — Part 165

A third unwise tendency is to degrade the mere giving of information--to belittle the value of facts acquired in any other way than in the course of deliberate effort by the pupil to relieve a problem or conflict or difficulty. As a protest against merely verbal knowledge, and merely memoriter knowledge, and neglect of the active, questioning search for knowledge, this tendency to belittle mere facts has been healthy, but as a general doctrine it is itself equally one-sided. Mere facts not got by the pupil's thinking are often of enormous value. They may stimulate to active thinking just as truly as that may stimulate to the reception of facts. In arithmetic, for example, the names of the numbers, the use of the fractional form to signify that the upper number is divided by the lower number, the early use of the decimal point in U. S. money to distinguish dollars from cents, and the meanings of "each," "whole," "part," "together," "in all," "sum," "difference," "product," "quotient," and the like are self-justifying facts.

The Psychology of Arithmetic — Part 165