The Johari window is a technique designed to help people better understand their relationship with themselves and others. It was created by psychologists Joseph Luft (1916–2014) and Harrington Ingham (1916–1995) in 1955, and is used primarily in self-help groups and corporate settings as a heuristic exercise. Luft and Ingham named their model "Johari" using a combination of their first names.

Description

In the exercise, someone picks a number of adjectives from a list, choosing ones they feel describe their own personality. The subject's peers then get the same list, and each picks an equal number of adjectives that describe the subject. These adjectives are then inserted into a two-by-two grid of four cells.

Johari window

In Inside Organizations: 21 Ideas for Managers (1990), Charles Handy calls this concept the Johari House with four rooms. Room one is the part of ourselves that both we and others can see into. Room two contains aspects that others see but we are unaware of. Room three is the unconscious part of us that neither we ourselves nor others see. Room four is the private space we know but hide from others.

Johari window

The four quadrants

Arena/Open

The open area is that part of our conscious self – our attitudes, behavior, motivation, values, and way of life – that we are aware of and that is known to others. We move within this area with freedom. We are "open books".

Johari window

Façade/hidden

Adjectives selected by the subject, but not by any of their peers, go in this quadrant. These are things the peers are either unaware of, or that are untrue but for the subject's claim.

Blind Spot

Adjectives not selected by subjects, but only by their peers go here. These represent what others perceive but the subject does not.

Unknown

Adjectives that neither the subject nor the peers selected go here. They represent the subject's behaviors or motives that no one participating recognizes – either because they do not apply or because of collective ignorance of these traits.

Johari adjectives

The participant can use adjectives like these as possible descriptions in the Johari window.

able

accepting

adaptable

bold

brave

calm

caring

cheerful

clever

complex

confident

dependable

dignified

empathetic

energetic

extroverted

friendly

giving

happy

helpful

idealistic

independent

ingenious

intelligent

introverted

kind

knowledgeable

logical

loving

mature

modest

nervous

observant

organized

patient

powerful

proud

quiet

reflective

relaxed

religious

responsive

searching

self-assertive

self-conscious

sensible

sentimental

shy

silly

smart

spontaneous

sympathetic

tense

trustworthy

warm

wise

witty

Motivational equivalent

The concept of meta-emotions categorized by basic emotions offers the possibility of a meta-emotional window as a motivational counterpart to the meta-cognitive Johari window.

Therapy

One therapeutic target may be the expansion of the Open (Arena) square at the expense of both the Unknown square and the Blind Spot square, resulting in greater knowledge of oneself, while voluntary disclosure of Private (Hidden or Facade) squares may result in greater interpersonal intimacy and friendship.

See also

There are known knowns – A phrase, where its opposite, unknown unknowns, was created with the Johari window

References

Further reading

Kormanski, Luethel M. Using the Johari Window to Study Characterization - JSTOR. 1988, https://www.jstor.org/stable/40029904. Newstrom, John W., and Stephen A. Rubenfeld (1983). “The Johari Window: A Reconceptualization.” Developments in Business Simulation and Experiential Learning: Proceedings of the Annual ABSEL Conference, https://journals.tdl.org/absel/index.php/absel/article/view/2298.

External links

Noogenesis article on the Johari Window, Examples of window-altering actions; game theory aspects. Online Johari Window tool, by Kevan Davis Johari Window - downloadable application - Fox Valley Technical College

1955 introductions

Personality tests