The Distinguished Ecclesiasticsof our Day, and which of them survived until the Destruction of the Churches.

1. this time, Felix, having presided over the church of Rome for five years, was succeeded by Eutychianus, but he in less than ten months left the position to Caius, who lived in our day. He held it about fifteen years, and was in turn succeeded by Marcellinus, who was overtaken by the persecution.

Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers: Series II/Volume I/Church History of Eusebius/Book VII/Chapter 32

2. About the same time

Timæus received the episcopate of Antioch

after Domnus, and Cyril, who lived in our day, succeeded him. In

his time we became acquainted with Dorotheus, a man of learning among those of his day, who was honored with the office of presbyter in Antioch. He was a lover of the beautiful in divine things, and devoted himself to the Hebrew language, so that he read the Hebrew Scriptures with facility.

Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers: Series II/Volume I/Church History of Eusebius/Book VII/Chapter 32

3. He belonged to those who were

especially liberal, and was not unacquainted with Grecian

propædeutics. Besides this he

was a eunuch, having been so

from his very birth. On this account, as if it were a miracle, the

emperor took him into his family, and

honored him by placing him over the purple dye-works at Tyre. We have

heard him expound the Scriptures wisely in the Church.

Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers: Series II/Volume I/Church History of Eusebius/Book VII/Chapter 32

4. After Cyril, Tyrannus received the episcopate of the

parish of Antioch. In his time occurred the destruction of the

churches.

5. Eusebius, who had come from the city of Alexandria, ruled the parishes of Laodicea after Socrates. The occasion of his removal thither was the affair of Paul. He went on this account to Syria, and was restrained from returning home by those there who were zealous in divine things. Among our contemporaries he was a beautiful example of religion, as is readily seen from the words of Dionysius which we have quoted.

6. Anatolius was appointed his successor; one good

man, as they say, following another. He also was an Alexandrian by

birth. In learning and skill in Greek philosophy, such as arithmetic

and geometry, astronomy, and dialectics in general, as well as in the

theory of physics, he stood first among the ablest men of our time, and

he was also at the head in rhetorical science. It is reported that for

this reason he was requested by the citizens of Alexandria to establish

there a school of Aristotelian philosophy.

7. They relate of him many other

eminent deeds during the siege of the Pyrucheium in Alexandria, on account of which he was especially honored by all those in high office; but I will give the following only as an example.

8. They say that bread had

failed the besieged, so that it was more difficult to withstand the

famine than the enemy outside; but he being present provided for them

in this manner. As the other part of the city was allied with the Roman

army, and therefore was not under siege, Anatolius sent for

Eusebius,—for he was still there before his transfer to Syria, and was among those who were not besieged, and possessed, moreover, a great reputation and a renowned name which had reached even the Roman general,—and he informed him of those who were perishing in the siege from famine.

9. When he learned this he

requested the Roman commander as the greatest possible favor, to grant

safety to deserters from the enemy. Having obtained his request, he

communicated it to Anatolius. As soon as he received the message he

convened the senate of Alexandria, and at first proposed that all

should come to a reconciliation with the Romans. But when he perceived

that they were angered by this advice, he said, “But I do not

think you will oppose me, if I counsel you to send the supernumeraries

and those who are in nowise useful to us, as old women and children and

old men, outside the gates, to go wherever they may please. For why

should we retain for no purpose these who must at any rate soon die? and why should we destroy with hunger those who are crippled and maimed in body, when we ought to provide only for men and youth, and to distribute the necessary bread among those who are needed for the garrison of the city?”

10. With such arguments he

persuaded the assembly, and rising first he gave his vote that the

entire multitude, whether of men or women, who were not needful for the

army, should depart from the city, because if they remained and

unnecessarily continued in the city, there would be for them no hope of

safety, but they would perish with famine.