Reference Re Residential Tenancies Act (Ontario), [1981] 1 S.C.R. 714 is a leading Supreme Court of Canada decision on the jurisdiction of superior courts provided by section 96 of the Constitution Act, 1867. The Court formulated a three-step test for determining whether an administrative body was encroaching upon the jurisdiction of the superior courts.

Test formulated by Court

Justice Dickson, writing for the majority, suggested the test. Firstly, it must be determined "whether the power or jurisdiction conforms to the power or jurisdiction exercised by superior, district or county courts at the time of Confederation." Secondly, the test asks "whether the function itself is different when viewed in that setting. In particular, can the function still be considered to be a 'judicial' function." Thirdly, the test asks the court to "review the tribunal's function as a whole in order to appraise the impugned function in its entire institutional context."

Reference Re Residential Tenancies Act (Ontario)

In this case, it was determined that Ontario's Residential Tenancies Act was not valid provincial legislation.

Reference Re Residential Tenancies Act (Ontario)

Subsequent case law

The test was later applied in Massey Ferguson Industries v. Govt. of Sask., [1981] 2 S.C.R. 413, and eventually modified in Sobeys Stores v. Yeomans, [1989] 1 S.C.R. 238.

Reference Re Residential Tenancies Act (Ontario)

See also

List of Supreme Court of Canada cases (Laskin Court)

Notes

External links

Canadian constitutional case law

Supreme Court of Canada cases

1981 in Canadian case law

Landlord–tenant law

Supreme Court of Canada reference question cases

Real property law of Canada