The eelpouts are the ray-finned fish family Zoarcidae. As the common name suggests, they are somewhat eel-like in appearance. All of the roughly 300 species are marine and mostly bottom-dwelling, some at great depths. Eelpouts are predominantly found in the Northern Hemisphere. The arctic, north pacific and north Atlantic oceans have the highest concentration of species, however species are found around the globe.

They are conventionally placed in the "perciform" assemblage; in fact, the Zoarcoidei seem to be specialized members of the Gasterosteiformes-Scorpaeniformes group of Acanthopterygii.

Eelpout

The largest member of the family is Zoarces americanus, which may reach 1.1 m in length. Other notable genera include Lycodapus and Gymnelus.

Eelpout

Taxonomy

The eelpout family was first proposed as the family Zoarchidae in 1839 by the English naturalist William John Swainson but the spelling was changed to Zoarcidae after the spelling of the genus Zoarces was corrected by Theodore Gill in 1861. The 5th edition of Fishes of the World classifies this family within the suborder Zoarcoidei, within the order Scorpaeniformes. Other authorities classify this family in the infraorder Zoarcales wihin the suborder Cottoidei of the Perciformes because removing the Scorpaeniformes from the Perciformes renders that taxon non monophyletic.

Eelpout

Fishes of the World mentions four subfamilies but does not assign genera to the subfamilies but these were set out in Anderson and Federov's Annotated Checklist and this has been followed by FishBase and Catalog of Fishes.

Subfamilies and genera

The eelpouts are classified into four subfamilies and 61 genera with around 300 species:

subfamily Gymnelinae Gill, 1863

Andriashevia Fedorov & Neelov, 1978

Barbapellis Iglésias, Dettai & Ozouf-Costaz, 2012

Bilabria Schmidt, 1936

Davidijordania Popov, 1931

Ericandersonia Shinohara & Sakurai, 2006

Gymnelopsis Soldatov, 1922

Gymnelus Reinhardt 1834

Hadropareia Schmidt, 1904

Krusensterniella Schmidt, 1904

Magadanichthys Shinohara, Nazarkin & Chereshnev, 2006

Melanostigma Günther, 1881

Nalbantichthys Schultz, 1967

Opaeophacus Bond & Stein, 1984

Puzanovia Fedorov, 1975

Seleniolycus Anderson, 1988

subfamily Lycodinae Gill, 1861

Aiakas Gosztonyi, 1977

Argentinolycus Matallanas & Corbella, 2012

Austrolycus Regan, 1913

Bellingshausenia Matallanas, 2009

Bentartia Matallanas, 2010

Bothrocara Bean, 1890

Bothrocarina Suvorov, 1935

Crossostomus Lahille, 1908

Dadyanos Whitley, 1951

Derepodichthys Gilbert, 1896

Dieidolycus Anderson, 1988

Eucryphycus Anderson, 1988

Exechodontes DeWitt, 1977

Gosztonyia Matallanas, 2009

Hadropogonichthys Fedorov, 1982

Iluocoetes Jenyns, 1842

Japonolycodes Shinohara, Sakurai & Machida, 2002

Letholycus Anderson, 1988

Lycenchelys Gill, 1884

Lycodapus Gilbert, 1890

Lycodes Reinhardt, 1831

Lycodichthys Pappenheim, 1911

Lycodonus Goode & Bean, 1883

Lycogrammoides Soldatov & Lindberg, 1928

Lyconema Gilbert, 1896

Maynea Cunningham, 1871

Notolycodes Gosztonyi, 1977

Oidiphorus McAllister & Rees 1964

Ophthalmolycus Regan, 1913

Pachycara Zugmayer. 1911

Patagolycus Matallanas & Corbella, 2012

Petroschmidtia Taranetz & Andriashev, 1934

Phucocoetes Jenyns, 1842

Piedrabuenia Gosztonyi, 1977

Plesienchelys Anderson, 1988

Pogonolycus Norman, 1937

Pyrolycus Machida & Hashimoto, 2002

Santelmoa Matallanas, 2010

Taranetzella Andriashev, 1952

Thermarces Rosenblatt & Cohen, 1986

Zestichthys Jordan & Hubbs, 1925

subfamily Lycozarcinae Andriashev, 1939

Lycozoarces Popov, 1935

subfamily Zoarcinae Swainson, 1839

Zoarces Cuvier 1829

Characteristics

The body of eelpouts is relatively elongated and laterally compressed. Their heads are relatively small and ovoid. Juveniles have a more rounded snout and relatively larger eye than adults. Their scales are absent or very small. The dorsal and anal fins are continuous down their bodies up to their caudal fin. They produce the pigment biliverdin, which turns their bones green. This feature has no apparent evolutionary function and is harmless. Overall, there is no sexual dimorphism.