The Indian society is buzzing with mixed emotions after the Supreme Court of India rejected the mercy killing petition filed by journalist Pinki Virani on behalf of Aruna Shanbaug who has been cared for and kept alive for 37 years at the KEM hospital, Mumbai, India. Who is Aruna Shanbaug? Widely used picture of Aruna Shanbaug Way back in 1973, Aruna Shanbaug was a 25yr old pretty, bubbly nurse, working in Mumbai's KEM hospital and dreaming of marrying her fiance – a young doctor colleague. Then one night her world was shattered when a ward boy, who resented being castigated by Aruna for his misdemeanors, decided to extract a cold blooded revenge. He attacked her one night in the hospital basement as she was changing out of her uniform before going home. He tied a dog chain round her neck, choking her, cutting off the blood supply to her brain and sodomized her. Then he left her lying there and went away, but not before robbing her of her earrings. Next day, Aruna was discovered by a cleaner, unconscious, lying in a pool of blood. It was then realised that the assault and resulting asphyxiation with the dog chain had left her cortically blind, speechless and paralysed due to a brain stem and cervical cord injury. The ward boy got a 7 ear sentence for attempted murder and robbery. He was not tried for rape as the matter of anal rape was then concealed at the time, perhaps fearing social repercussions on the victim. Since then, Aruna Shanbaug has been lying in a ‘vegetative state’ in a ward at the KEM hospital. Her own family gave up on her and for these 37 years, she has been kept alive and cared for by the nurses at the KEM hospital. She faded from public memory untill 1998, when journalist Pinki Virani wrote ‘Aruna's Story’, a book that brought her back into the public consciousness. The issue being debated today Pinki Virani, on Aruna's behalf, filed a plea with the Apex Court to end Aruna's life and requested that the hospital be asked to stop force-feeding Aruna. The plea was admitted in the Supreme Court in December 2009. The plea was opposed strongly by the doctors and nurses at the KEM hospital as well the Indian government. On 7th March, 2011, the Supreme Court after a lot of deliberation, rejected the plea of mercy killing for Aruna but, in what is being seen as a landmark ruling, allowed for passive euthanasia in exceptional circumstances, to be decided by High Courts on a case to case basis. The case has rekindled the debate on euthanasia in the Indian society, with people expressing mixed reactions to the Aruna Shanbaug verdict. Questions have been raised as to whom a mercy killing really benefits. Also, there is a lot of anger on knowing that the perpetrator of the crime got just 7years in jail while his victim got 37years of agony and counting. The conversations have also gathered momentum online with netizens discussing it on Twitter, Facebook, blogs and forums. Most of the reactions and conversations were highly emotion-laden. Pinki Virani, for her part, drew a lot of flak from a section of netizens for entering such a plea in the first place. Those opposing her argued that since she was neither a blood relative nor a long-term caregiver, she had no right to file a mercy killing plea on behalf of Aruna, that too a request to stop her feeding. Rajanna Venkatraman writes on his blog: Pinki Virani, a writer who wrote Aruna's story filed a writ petition in supreme court to stop feeding Aruna. I do not understand the fact. Why should Pinki move to the court to stop feeding Aruna? Isnt it better that Aruna is euthanised in a much better way using the medicines available. Why should we torture her more and make her emaciated and undergo the pain of hunger when she cannot even express it? The nurses who feed her said that Aruna likes non veg food and they understood it from her gestures. Why should she be killed? Do we, for sure, know that Aruna wants to die? Blogger unfairandlovely comments on her blog if Aruna has a “friend”, it is not Pinki Virani who has so conveniently appropriated the tag for herself, but this group of tireless, selfless people [her caregivers at the KEM hospital]… Aruna's “blood realtives” disappeared from her life a very long time ago. Nobody really knows why and without knowing those reasons, we are in no position to judge them. But it doesn't matter, because Aruna's real family at the KEM hospital never left, staying with her and supporting her for every single day of her life. I am very proud of the Supreme Court of India, because what it took into account while passing the verdict rejecting the plea to end Aruna's life was the only testimony that mattered – that of Aruna's “family” that has cared for her these 37 long years.