================================================================== | Wernle | All Five | Three or More |Total 5|Total 3 |----------------|----------------|---------------|-------|------- | 7-12 | 7-10 | 7-12 | 4 | 6 | 3-10 | 3-10 | 1-11 | 8 | 11 | 3-48 | 3, 4, 6, 39-40,| 1-4, 6, 11, | 11 | 23 | | 42, 44-48 | 12, 18, 25-26,| | | | | 38, 40-48, | | | | | 13, 32 | | | | | | | | 9-13, 19-34 | 20-33 | 9-13, 20-33 | 14 | 19 | | | | | | | | | | | 1-6, 7-11 | 1-2, 3-5, 7-11 | 1-5, 7, 11-13,| 10 | 21 | | | 17-19, | | | | | 21, 22, | | | | | 24-27 | | | 5-13, 19-22 | 5-13 | 5-13, 19-22 | 6 | 10 | | | | | | 37-38 | | 37-38 | | 2 | 5-16, 23-25, | 7, 10, 12, 13, | 7, 10, 12, 13,| 5 | 22 | 40-42, 26-39 | 15 | 15, 16, | | | | | 24-40 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 33, 20-27, 2-19| 3-9, 11, 16-19,| 2-13, 16-27 | 18 | 24 | | 21-23, | | | | | 25-27 | | | | 22-37, 58-59, | 22, 23, 27, | 22-25, 27, | 8 | 16 | 38-45 | 28, 38, 39, | 28, 30, 32, | | | | 41, 42 | 35, 38, 39, | | | | | 41-45 | | | | | | | | 16, 17, 31-33 | | 16-17, 31-33 | | 5 | | | | | | | | | | | 7, 12-22 | | 7, 12, 13, 15,| | 6 | | | 21, 22 | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1-14 | | 1-10 | | 10 | 1-39 | 13, 23, 25, | 13-15, 23, | 10 | 17 | | 27, 29-31, | 25-27, 29-32, | | | | 34-36 | 34-39 | | | | | | | | 26-28, 37-51 | 27-28, 37-41 | 26-28, 37-51 | 7 | 15 | | | | | | 14-30 | | 29 | | 1 |----------------|----------------|---------------|-------|------- | 302 | 101 | 208 | 101 | 208 ------------------------------------------------------------------
The analysis of Wellhausen is the least elaborate of the five, and that of Wernle is almost as simple. The other three show more disposition to select out the verse or part of the verse which, occuring in the midst of Q material, should nevertheless be assigned to some other source. Weiss adds a question mark to several of his sections, but these have been included in the table. All the students say that not the same certainty attaches to all the sections which they have included. Sir John Hawkins, especially, says he does not consider his work a "reconstruction of Q," which, with Mr. Burkitt, he considers a task beyond the data at our command.
According to these five scholars, Q has furnished a source for Matthew in eleven chapters. According to three out of the five, Q is found in sixteen chapters. Harnack and Hawkins agree in finding one verse each in chaps. xv, xvii, and xix. Weiss alone finds two-thirds of a verse in xxi. Among the five, they find Q in twenty chapters. The only chapters in which Q is not found by any of them are i, ii, xiv, xvi, xx, xxvi, xxvii, and xxviii.