Especially complicated was the ancient Babylonian demonology; all the petty annoyances of life--a sudden fall, a headache, a quarrel--were set down to the agency of fiends; all the stronger emotions--love, hate, jealousy and so on--were regarded as the work of demons; in fact so numerous were they, that there were special fiends for various parts of the human body--one for the head, another for the neck, and so on. Similarly in Egypt at the present day the _jinn_ are believed to swarm so thickly that it is necessary to ask their permission before pouring water on the ground, lest one should accidentally be soused and vent his anger on the offending human being. But these beliefs are far from being confined to the uncivilized; Greek philosophers like Porphyry, no less than the fathers of the Church, held that the world was pervaded with spirits; side by side with the belief in witchcraft, we can trace through the middle ages the survival of primitive animistic views; and in our own day even these beliefs subsist in unsuspected vigour among the peasantry of the more uneducated European countries. In fact the ready acceptance of spiritualism testifies to the force with which the primitive animistic way of looking at things appealed to the white races in the middle of the last century.

_Character of Spiritual World._--The ascription of malevolence to the world of spirits is by no means universal. In West Africa the Mpongwe believe in local spirits, just as do the Eskimo; but they are regarded as inoffensive in the main; true, the passer-by must make some trifling offering as he nears their place of abode; but it is only occasionally that mischievous acts, such as the throwing down of a tree on a passer-by, are, in the view of the natives, perpetuated by the Ombuiri. So too, many of the spirits especially concerned with the operations of nature are conceived as neutral or even benevolent; the European peasant fears the corn-spirit only when he irritates him by trenching on his domain and taking his property by cutting the corn; similarly, there is no reason why the more insignificant personages of the pantheon should be conceived as malevolent, and we find that the _Petara_ of the Dyaks are far from indiscriminating and malignant, though disease and death are laid at their door.

Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th Edition, Volume 8, Slice 2 — Part 14