[88] SIR JAMES MACKINTOSH, "Encyc., Britan.," Preliminary Dissertation, p. 354.
[90] Ibid., VI. 728, 730, 760, 826, 835, 866.
[91] NEWMAN'S "Essay on Development," p. 27.
[92] NEWMAN'S "Essay on Development," p. 38.
[94] BROWNSON'S "Quarterly Review," No. 1, p. 43.
[95] SEDGWICK'S "Discourse," Fourth Edition. Preface, CCCXCIII.
[97] Letters of Rev. W. A. BUTLER on the "Development of Christian Doctrine," p. 116.
[98] PIERRE LEROUX, "Sur l'Humanite." AUGUSTUS COMTE, "Positive Calendar." The author gave some account of this in an article contributed to the "North British Review," May, 1851.
[99] PROFESSOR BUTLER'S "Letters," p. 87.
[101] DR. WORDSWORTH, "Letters to M. Gondon," p. 153.
[102] LYELL, "Principles of Geology," I. 75.
At the commencement of the present century, Pantheism might have been justly regarded and safely treated as an obsolete and exploded error,--an error which still prevailed, indeed, in the East as one of the hereditary beliefs of Indian superstition, but which, when transplanted to Western Europe by the daring genius of Spinoza, was found to be an exotic too sickly to take root and grow amidst the fresh and bracing air of modern civilization.
But no one who has marked the recent tendencies of speculative thought, and who is acquainted, however slightly, with the character of modern literature, can have failed to discern a remarkable change in this respect within the last fifty years. German philosophy, always prolific, and often productive of monstrous births, has given to the world many elaborate systems, physical and metaphysical, whose most prominent feature is the deification of Nature or of Man. France, always alert and lively, has appropriated the ideas of her more ponderous neighbors, and has given them currency through educated Europe on the wings of her lighter literature. And even in England and America there are not wanting some significant tokens of a disposition to cherish a kind of speculation which, if it be not formally and avowedly Pantheistic, has much of the same dreamy and mystic character, and little, if any, harmony with definite views of God, or of the relations which He bears to man.