(1887.) An Open Letter to Robert G. IngersollóSuperstitionsóBasis of ReligionóNapoleon's Question about the StarsóThe Idea of GodóCrushing out HopeóAtonement, Regeneration, and Future RetributionóSocrates and JesusóThe Language of Col. Ingersoll characterized as too SweepingóThe SabbathóBut a Step from Sneering at Religion to Sneering at Morality. A Reply to the Rev. Henry M. Field, D. D.óHonest Differences of OpinionóCharles DarwinóDr. Field's Distinction between Superstition and ReligionóThe Presbyterian God an Infinite TorquemadaóNapoleon's Sensitiveness to the Divine InfluenceóThe Preference of AgassizóThe Mysterious as an ExplanationóThe Certainty that God is not what he is Thought to BeóSelf-preservation the Fibre of SocietyóDid the Assassination of Lincoln Illustrate the Justice of God's Judgments?óImmortalityóHope and the Presbyterian CreedóTo a Mother at the Grave of Her SonóTheological Teaching of ForgivenessóOn Eternal RetributionóJesus and MohammedóAttacking the Religion of OthersóAnanias and SapphiraóThe Pilgrims and Freedom to WorshipóThe Orthodox SabbathóNatural Restraints on ConductóReligion and MoralityóThe Efficacy of PrayeróRespect for Belief of Father and MotheróThe "Power behind Nature"óSurvival of the FittestóThe Saddest Factó"Sober Second Thought." A Last Word to Robert G. Ingersoll, by Dr. FieldóGod not a PresbyterianóWhy Col. Ingersoll's Attacks on Religion are ResentedóGod is more Merciful than ManóTheories about the Future LifeóRetribution a Necessary Part of the Divine LawóThe Case of Robinson CrusoeóIrresistible Proof of DesignóCol. Ingersoll's View of ImmortalityóAn Almighty Friend. Letter to Dr. FieldóThe Presbyterian GodóWhat the Presbyterians ClaimóThe "Incurably Bad"óResponsibility for not seeing Things ClearlyóGood Deeds should Follow even AtheistsóNo Credit in BeliefóDesign Argument that Devours ItselfóBelief as a Foundation of Social OrderóNo Consolation in Orthodox ReligionóThe "Almighty Friend" and the Slave Motheróa Hindu PrayeróCalvinismóChrist not the Supreme Benefactor of the Race.
(1888.) Some Remarks on his Reply to Dr. Field by the Hon. Wm. E. GladstoneóExternal Triumph and Prosperity of the ChurchóA Truth Half StatedóCol. Ingersoll's Tumultuous Method and lack of Reverential CalmóJephthah's SacrificeóHebrews xii ExpoundedóThe Case of AbrahamóDarwinism and the ScripturesóWhy God demands Sacrifices of ManóProblems admitted to be InsolubleóRelation of human Genius to Human GreatnessóShakespeare and OthersóChrist and the Family RelationóInaccuracy of Reference in the ReplyóAnanias and SapphiraóThe Idea of ImmortalityóImmunity of Error in Belief from Moral ResponsibilityóOn Dishonesty in the Formation of OpinionóA Plausibility of the Shallowest kindóThe System of ThuggismóPersecution for Opinion's SakeóRiding an Unbroken Horse. Col. Ingersoll to Mr. GladstoneóOn the "Impaired" State of the human ConstitutionóUnbelief not Due to DegeneracyóObjections to the Scheme of RedemptionóDoes Man Deserve only Punishment?ó"Reverential Calm"óThe Deity of the Ancient JewsóJephthah and AbrahamóRelation between Darwinism and the Inspiration of the ScripturesóSacrifices to the InfiniteóWhat is Common Sense?óAn Argument that will Defend every SuperstitionóThe Greatness of ShakespeareóThe Absolute Indissolubility of MarriageóIs the Religion of Christ for this Age?óAs to Ananias and SapphiraóImmortality and People of Low Intellectual DevelopmentóCan we Control our Thought?óDishonest Opinions Cannot be FormedóSome Compensations for Riding an "Unbroken Horse."