[213] _Cf._ the opinion in the Savannah Fertilizer case in our Railway Problems, chap. XII.
[214] Chapter XI, _infra_, also in volume II.
[215] 10 Int. Com. Rep., 111; reprinted in full in our Railway Problems, chap. X. Also the Commerce Court decision in chap. XVI, _infra_.
[216] The leading Wichita cases are as follows: 9 I.C.C. Rep., 507, 534 and 558.--10 _Idem_, 460. (Lehmann Higginson Co.).--13 _Idem_, 389. Also 189 U. S. Rep., 274.--Also Senate (Elkins) Committee, 1905, IV. p. 2874 _et seq._
[218] 8 Int. Com. Rep., 346; reprinted in full in our Railway Problems, chap. XI.
[222] 5 I.C.C. Rep., 324; p. 480, _infra_.
[223] _Cf._ Commissioner Fifer's dissenting opinion in the St. Louis Business Men's League case, 9 Int. Com. Rep., 318; reprinted in our Railway Problems, chap. XVII.
[225] 11 I.C.C. Rep., 495; 15 _Idem_, 555; U. S. Industrial Commission, IV, p. 264 and IX, p. 287. Also pp. 129, _supra_, and 442, _infra_.
[226] The feasibility of doing this in the South could all parties concerned be whipped into line, is demonstrated by the ingenious adaptation of the trunk line system to local conditions by a special committee of the Southern Railway and Steamship Association in 1880. Report of meeting August 12, 1880, in Proceedings, VII.
[227] 7 I.C.C. Rep., 92. The report and opinion is reprinted in full by the Senate (Elkins) Committee, 1905, as Appendix H.
[229] Pp. 223, _supra_; and 296, _infra_.
[230] Similar cases are 12 I.C.C. Rep., 564; 14 _Idem_, 476 on oranges; 16 _Idem_, 276; 22 _Idem_, 93 and 115; and 23 _Idem_, 195; are local but identical problems of distances. Also the Superior Commercial Club case, just handed down June 25, 1912, on grain rates. _Cf._ also Hammond, Railway Rate Theories, etc., p. 94.
[231] 7 Int. Com. Rep., 458; reprinted in our Railway Problems, chap. XII.
[232] Chapter XIV, _infra_, discusses its legal aspect. Reprinted in full in our Railway Problems, chap. VI.
[233] _Cf._ testimony in Elkins Committee Report, 1905, p. 2726. The Commerce Court case on page 588, _infra_, brings it to date.
[234] _Cf._ Answer of Receivers' and Shippers' Association of Cincinnati to statement of W. J. Murphy, etc., March 15, 1907.
[235] Senate (Elkins) Committee Report, 1905, Digest, Appendix III., p. 231.