(120.) This computation is founded upon results obtained from the use chiefly of the North of England coal. It has, however, been stated in evidence before the select committee above mentioned, that the _Llangennech_ coal of Wales is considerably more powerful. Captain Wilson, who commanded the HUGH LINDSAY steamer in India, has stated that this coal is more powerful than Newcastle, in the proportion of 9 to 6-1/2.[43] Some of the commanders of the Mediterranean packets have likewise stated that the strength of this coal is greater than that of Newcastle in the proportion of 16 to 11.[44] So far then as relates to this coal, the above estimate must be modified, by reducing the consumption nearly in the proportion of 3 to 2.
[Footnote 43: Vide Report of Select Committee on Steam Navigation, p. 152.]
The class of vessels best fitted for undertaking long voyages, without relays of coal, would be one from about 800 to 1000 tons measurement furnished with engines from 200 to 250 horse-power.[45] Such vessels could take a supply of from 300 to 400 tons of coals, which being consumed at the rate of from 20 to 25 tons per day, would last about fifteen days.
[Footnote 45: Engines in steam vessels generally work considerably above their nominal power. The power, however, to which we uniformly refer is the nominal power, or that power at which they would work with steam of the ordinary pressure.]
Applying these results, however, to particular cases, it will be necessary to remember that they are average calculations, and must be subject to such modifications as the circumstances may suggest in the particular instances: thus, if a voyage is contemplated under circumstances in which an adverse wind generally prevails, less than the average speed must be allowed, or, what is the same, a greater consumption of fuel for a given distance. Against a strong head wind, in which a sailing vessel would double-reef her top-sails, even a powerful steamer cannot make more than from 2 to 3 miles an hour, especially if she has a head sea to encounter.
(121.) In considering the general economy of fuel, it may be right to state, that the results of experience obtained in the steam navigation of our channels, and particularly in the case of the Post Office packets on the Liverpool station, have clearly established the fact, that by increasing the ratio of the power to the tonnage, an actual saving of fuel in a given distance is effected, while at the same time the speed of the vessel is increased. In the case of the Post Office steamers called the DOLPHIN and the THETIS (Liverpool station,) the power has been successively increased, and the speed proportionably augmented; but the consumption of fuel per voyage between Liverpool and Dublin has been diminished. This, at first view, appears inconsistent with the known theory of the resistance of solids moving through fluids; since this resistance increases in the same proportion as the square of the speed. But this physical principle is founded on the supposition that the immersed part of the floating body remains the same. Now I have myself proved by experiments on canals, that when the speed of the boat is increased beyond a certain limit, its draught of water is rapidly diminished; and in the case of a large steam raft constructed upon the river Hudson, it was found that when the speed was raised to 20 miles an hour, the draught of water was diminished by 7 inches. I have therefore no doubt that the increased speed of steamers is attended with a like effect; that, in fact, they rise out of the water; so that, although the resistance is increased by reason of their increased speed, it is diminished in a still greater proportion by reason of their diminished immersion.
