The First Journey Abroad—Life in Moscow—Bear Hunting

January 29th [1857] Tolstoy left Moscow and traveled by mail

post to Warsaw and from Warsaw by rail to Paris, where he arrived

on February 21 [1857].

There turgenev awaited him. As early as January 23rd the

latter wrote to Druzhinin:

Leo Tolstoy: His Life and Work/Chapter 11

Tolstoy writes that he intends coming over here, and

then going in the spring from here to Italy. Tell him to

make haste, if he wishes to find me. Anyhow, I will

write to him myself. Judging from his letters, I see

that he is going through most beneficial changes, and I

am rejoicing at it like an "old nurse". I have read his

"A Russian Landowner" which pleased me very much by its

frankness and almost full freedom of conviction; I say

"almost", because in the way he states the problem to

himself lies (perhaps unknown to him) a certain

prejudice. The essential moral impression of the tale (I

don't speak of the artistic one) is this, that until

serfdom ceases to exist, there would be no possibility of

rapprochement and mutual understanding in spite of the

most disinterested, honest desire to meet, and this

impression is good and true; but side by side with it

runs another secondary impression -- namely, that on the

whole, teaching the peasant or improving his position is

useless, and I cannot agree with this impression. But

his mastery of the language, of the tale, of

characteristics is very great.

Leo Tolstoy: His Life and Work/Chapter 11

After meeting Tolstoy, Turgenev wrote to Polonskiy:

Leo Tolstoy: His Life and Work/Chapter 11

Tolstoy is here. A change for the better has taken

place in him, and a very considerable one.

This man will go far and will leave a deep trail

after him.

In a letter to Kalbasin dated March 8, 1857, from Paris, Turgenev said:

I very often see Tolstoy here, and I had the other

day a very nice letter from Nekrasov dated from Rome.

But I cannot become intimate with Tolstoy, we take

such different views.

This is Tolstoy's estimate at that time of Turgenev and

Nekrasov, whom Tolstoy found in Paris, as quoted by Botkin in his

letter to Druzhinin of March 8, 1857.

Tolstoy writes thus about his interview with him:

They are both roaming in a sort of darkness, they

are dejected and complain of life, do nothing, and

apparently both feel the weight of their mutual

relations.

Turgenev writes that Nekrasov suddenly went away again to

Rome. Tolstoy's letter is only a page but full of vitality and

freshness. Germany interests him very much and he intends to study

that country more fully by-and-by. In a month's time he starts for

Rome.

This correspondence shows that the relations between Tolstoy

and Turgenev were always unsatisfactory, and that with all their

efforts, they could not become cordial friends.

In March, Tolstoy and Turgenev made a journey to Dijon and

spent a few days together there. While there, Tolstoy wrote the

tale about the musician Albert. Then they came back to Paris, where Tolstoy witnessed an execution which he described in his "Confession," and which made an indelible impression upon him, of which he made a brief entry in his diary:

6th April 1857: I rose before seven and went to see

an execution. A stout, white, health neck and breast: he kissed the Gospel and then--death. What a senseless thing! It made a strong impression, which has not been in vain. I am not a political man. Morality and Art I know that I love and can...The guillotine for a long time prevented me from sleeping, forcing me to look round.

This is what he says on the subject in "How I Came to

Believe":

thus, during my stay in Paris, the sight of a public

execution revealed to me the weakness of my superstitious

belief in progress. When I saw the head divided from the

body and heard the sound with which they fell separately

into the box, I understood, not with my reason, but with

my whole being, that no theory of the wisdom of all

established things, nor of progress, could justify such

an act; and that if all the men in the world from the day

of creation, by whatever theory, had found this thing

necessary, it was not so, it was an evil thing. and

that, therefore, I must judge of what was right and

necessary, not by what men said and did, not by progress, but what I felt to be true in my heart.