WASHINGTON - U.S. President Donald Trump’s new national security strategy will provide the country with a "clear and actionable playbook" to counter the most dangerous and persistent threats, according to senior administration officials.
The White House , almost 11 months after his administration began work on it.
Trump explained how much of the strategy is already impacting U.S. policy during a speech Monday in Washington.
Senior administration officials say unlike recent, past strategies, it takes a "clear-eyed view" of the dangers and challenges facing the country, while prioritizing U.S. interests in line with the president’s calls to put "America First."
"The global balance of power has shifted in unfavorable manners to American interests," a senior administration official said Sunday. "This new strategy presents a plan of how America can regain momentum to reverse many of these trends."
"[It] that will really serve as a foundation for subsequent strategies," the official added, alluding to soon to be released defense and counterterrorism documents.
Administration officials say despite their concerns, the new national security strategy is not meant as a repudiation of the strategies laid out by former President Barack Obama or even former President George W. Bush.
Instead, they say the document is an "encapsulation" of the strategy Trump has advocated, both while campaigning for the presidency and once in office.
"We do live in a global competition and how we advance our goals is more critical than ever," the senior administration official said. "We must compete."
To better compete on the global stage, Trump administration officials are focusing on what they describe as four, vital national interests: protecting the homeland, promoting American prosperity, preserving peace through strength, and advancing American influence.
"We have to work together harder than ever to ensure that nations uphold the rule of law, respect the sovereignty of their neighbors and support the post-World War II, post-Cold War order of peace, stability and collective security," White House National Security Adviser Gen. H.R. McMaster said while previewing the new strategy last week in Washington.
The strategy identifies three groups of challengers to that order, officials say.
The first group includes nations like Russia and China, which are seeking to create a new global order, both militarily and economically, that officials believe will hurt or hamper U.S. interests.
The second group of challengers are rogue regimes, like North Korea and Iran, which are pursuing weapons of mass destruction while also supporting terrorism and other destabilizing activities.
The final group includes transnational terrorist groups and crime syndicates.
Administration officials say the new national security strategy will confront these different challengers on the global stage.
"We vacated a lot of competitive space in recent years and created opportunities," McMaster said. "You'll see a big emphasis on competitive engagement."
But exactly how the U.S. will do that remains a bit of a question.
"This document is more high-level and over-arching," said a second senior administration official. "It doesn't move country-by-country."
Still, some officials and analysts say elements of the new national security strategy are already evident in Washington’s approach to countries from Russia and China to North Korea, Iran and South Asia.
U.S. Defense Secretary Jim Mattis "I think, is going to take a different approach to military conflict," said Bryan Clark, a senior fellow at The Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments and a former Naval military strategist.
At the same time, the new strategy seeks to push back against the notion that President Trump’s campaign rallying cry of "America first," should be interpreted as "American alone."
Yet some see this as an area in which the Trump administration could struggle, especially given the way the new strategy priorities and emphasizes U.S. economic interests.
"Focusing on protection of American economic interests in a global marketplace painted with rivals, rather than partners, will discourage the use of multilateral trade agreements in a global economy marked by partnership," said Nicholas Glavin, formerly a researcher at the U.S. Naval War College's Center on Irregular Warfare and Armed Groups.
Glavin, who is currently studying at The Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy, says that could actually weaken U.S. attempt to compete against key rivals on the word stage.