But although the judgement upon the Sublime in nature needs culture (more than the judgement upon the Beautiful), it is not therefore primarily produced by culture and introduced in a merely conventional way into society. Rather has it root in human nature, even in that which, alike with common Understanding, we can impute to and expect of every one, viz. in the tendency to the feeling for (practical) Ideas, _i.e._ to the moral feeling.

Hereon is based the necessity of that agreement of the judgement of others about the sublime with our own which we include in the latter. For just as we charge with want of _taste_ the man who is indifferent when passing judgement upon an object of nature that we regard as beautiful; so we say of him who remains unmoved in the presence of that which we judge to be sublime, he has no _feeling_. But we claim both from every man, and we presuppose them in him if he has any culture at all; only with the difference, that we expect the former directly of every one, because in it the Judgement refers the Imagination merely to the Understanding, the faculty of concepts; but the latter, because in it the Imagination is related to the Reason, the faculty of Ideas, only under a subjective presupposition (which, however, we believe we are authorised in imputing to every one), viz. the presupposition of the moral feeling [in man.[52]] Thus it is that we ascribe necessity to this aesthetical judgement also.

Kant's Critique of Judgement — Part 91

In this modality of aesthetical judgements, viz. in the necessity claimed for them, lies an important moment of the Critique of Judgement. For it enables us to recognise in them an _a priori_ principle, and raises them out of empirical psychology, in which otherwise they would remain buried amongst the feelings of gratification and grief (only with the unmeaning addition of being called _finer_ feelings). Thus it enables us too to place the Judgement among those faculties that have _a priori_ principles at their basis, and so to bring it into Transcendental Philosophy.

Kant's Critique of Judgement — Part 91

GENERAL REMARK UPON THE EXPOSITION OF THE AESTHETICAL REFLECTIVE JUDGEMENT

Kant's Critique of Judgement — Part 91

In reference to the feeling of pleasure an object is to be classified as either _pleasant_, or _beautiful_, or _sublime_, or _good_ (absolutely), (_jucundum_, _pulchrum_, _sublime_, _honestum_).