That punctuation is important all agree; but how few comprehend the extent of its importance! The writer who neglects punctuation, or mis-punctuates, is liable to be misunderstood--this, according to the popular idea, is the sum of the evils arising from heedlessness or ignorance. It does not seem to be known that, even where the sense is perfectly clear, a sentence may be deprived of half its force--its spirit--its point--by improper punctuation. For the want of merely a comma, it often occurs that an axiom appears a paradox, or that a sarcasm is converted into a sermonoid.

There is _no_ treatise on the topic--and there is no topic on which a treatise is more needed. There seems to exist a vulgar notion that the subject is one of pure conventionality, and cannot be brought within the limits of intelligibly and consistent _rule_. And yet, if fairly looked in the face, the whole matter is so plain that its _rationale_ may be read as we run. If not anticipated, I shall, hereafter, make an attempt at a magazine paper on "The Philosophy of Point."

Graham's Magazine Vol. XXXII No. 2. February 1848 — Part 117

In the meantime let me say a word or two of _the dash_. Every writer for the press, who has any sense of the accurate, must have been frequently mortified and vexed at the distortion of his sentences by the printer's now general substitution of a semicolon, or comma, for the dash of the MS. The total or nearly total disuse of the latter point, has been brought about by the revulsion consequent upon its excessive employment about twenty years ago. The Byronic poets were _all_ dash. John Neal, in his earlier novels, exaggerated its use into the grossest abuse--although his very error arose from the philosophical and self-dependent spirit which has always distinguished him, and which will even yet lead him, if I am not greatly mistaken in the man, to do something for the literature of the country which the country "will not willingly," and cannot possibly, "let die."

Graham's Magazine Vol. XXXII No. 2. February 1848 — Part 117

Without entering now into the _why_, let me observe that the printer may always ascertain when the dash of the MS. is properly and when improperly employed, by bearing in mind that this point represents _a second thought--an emendation_. In using it just above I have exemplified its use. The words "an emendation" are, speaking with reference to grammatical construction, put in _ap_position with the words "a second thought." Having written these latter words, I reflected whether it would not be possible to render their meaning more distinct by certain other words. Now, instead of erasing the phrase "a second thought," which is of _some_ use--which _partially_ conveys the idea intended--which advances me _a step toward_ my full purpose--I suffer it to remain, and merely put a dash between it and the phrase "an emendation." The dash gives the reader a choice between two, or among three or more expressions, one of which may be more forcible than another, but all of which help out the idea. It stands, in general, for these words--"_or, to make my meaning more distinct_." This force _it has_--and this force no other point can have; since all other points have well-understood uses quite different from this. Therefore, the dash _cannot_ be dispensed with.

Graham's Magazine Vol. XXXII No. 2. February 1848 — Part 117