[19] _Bellings_, i. 92; Carte's _Ormonde_, i. 343; Smith's _Hist. of Cork; A most exact Relation of a Victory_, &c., London, October 3, 1642; _Digitus Dei_, or a miraculous victory, London, September 20. The latter writer notes that Stephenson had 'an exceeding rich saddle.' _A Journal of the most memorable passage in Ireland_, London, October 19, 1642, by an eye-witness, notes that 'almost all the Lords of Munster were present'--Roche, Muskerry, Ikerrin, Dunboyne, Brittas, Castleconnell, and one of Ormonde's brothers. As to Ardmore, besides the Journal, see _A True Relation of God's Providence in Munster_, which says between seventy and eighty were hanged. The letter quoted in _Several Passages_, &c., London, September 16, says 116, adding, 'this is most true.'

[20] _A Relation from Viscount Conway_, from June 17 to July 30, London, 1642. This was sent to a worthy M.P., who published it; it is well written, but badly printed.

Ireland under the Stuarts and during the Interregnum, Vol. II (of 3), 1642-1660 — Part 24

[21] _A True Relation of the Taking of Mountjoy_, &c., June 25 to July 8, London, August 4, 1642; _A Relation from Belfast_, London, August 17, carries this a little further. A good many cows were caught, and the country, without taking Charlemont, was swept for some twelve miles from Mountjoy.

Ireland under the Stuarts and during the Interregnum, Vol. II (of 3), 1642-1660 — Part 24

[22] Bellings in _Confederation and War_, i. 111; Acts of General Assembly, _ib._ ii. 73; Richard Martin's letter of December 2, 1642, in Clanricarde's _Memoirs_, 296.

Ireland under the Stuarts and during the Interregnum, Vol. II (of 3), 1642-1660 — Part 24

[23] Acts of General Assembly, _ut sup._ ii. 88.

[24] Letters from the Supreme Council to foreign powers, November and December 1642, _Confederation and War_, ii. 99-129. The oath of association of the Confederates, _ib._ 210; also in _Cox_, appx. xiv. and (omitting the last paragraph) in Walsh's _Remonstrance_, appx. i. p. 31. The latter, dated July 26, 1644, is evidently not the earliest form. In _Vindiciæ Catholicorum Hiberniæ_, Paris, 1650, p. 6, is a much shorter Latin oath, which places the Church first, the King second, and the national liberties third, but is called 'associationis juramentum,' like the others.

[25] _Bellings_, i. 90; _Castlehaven_, 35.

[26] Tucker's Journal in _Confederation and War_, ii. 189, January 30, 1642-3. The Commission, dated January 11, is in Carte's _Ormonde_, iii. No. 117. _Castlehaven._