Cf. Barker, _op. cit._, p. 37; cf. above on Sophists; also Dunning, _Political Theories Ancient and Mediaeval_ (1913), pp. 103 f.

Cf. Hasbach, _Allgemeine philosophische Grundlagen der Pol. Econ._ (1890), pp. 76 and 36 f.; Dunning, as above.

A History of Greek Economic Thought — Part 119

For his life, cf. Zeller, II, 1, 280 ff., and Diog. L. vi. A few fragments of his philosophical dialogues are extant. Cf. above, p. 126, n. 7. for his _Economicus_. He and Diogenes are discussed at this point, since the Cynic movement as a whole is logically post-Aristotelian.

A History of Greek Economic Thought — Part 119

Diog. L. vi. 1. 15; cf. Gomperz, _op. cit._, II, 117 and note, with citations from Dio of Prusa; also Zeller, _op. cit._, II, 1, 325 f. and note, who thinks Plato’s ironical “city of pigs” (_Rep._ ii) may well have been a reference to the ideas of Antisthenes.

A History of Greek Economic Thought — Part 119

Cf. preceding note, and _infra_, on later ideal states.

_Pol._ i. 1253a1-4: ἄνθρωπος φύσει πολιτικὸν ζῷον, etc.

Dionis Prus. _Opera_ (ed. Arnim, 1893, or vi. 25 f.), ascribed to Diogenes, but it was also the idea of Antisthenes. Cf. Gomperz, _op. cit._, II, 118; compare Rousseau.

Xen. _Symp._ iv. 34, 34-43, on the advantages and disadvantages of the two kinds of wealth; iii. 8; _Econ._ i. 7 f.; ii. 2 f.

Mullach, _op. cit._, II, p. 289, fr. 86: φιλάργυρος.

Diog. L. vi. 2, καὶ ὅτι ὁ πόνος ἀγαθὸν συνέστησε διὰ τοῦ μεγάλου Ἡρακλέους καὶ τοῦ κύρου. Heracles, the toiler, was their patron saint. Antisthenes is said to have written two dialogues called Heracles (Diog. L. vi. 2. 18), but Zeller, (_op. cit._, II, 1, 307, n. 4) thinks only one was genuine.

Cf. _infra_ on Diogenes. Ar. _Pol._ 1253b20-22 probably refers to the Cynics, as holding it to be κατὰ φύσιν, οὐδὲ δίκαιων, and βίαιων. Cf. Newman, _op. cit._, I, 140, n. 2, on this. He cites Strabo, p. 15; 110, on the opposition of the Cynic Onesicritus to slavery. Cf. above, pp. 97 ff.; Zeller, _op. cit._, II, 1, 280 ff., 323 f.

Cf. _infra_ on Diogenes and _Eryxias_; Ar. _Pol._ 1257_b_10, probably Cynic.

412-323 B.C.; cf. Zeller, _op. cit._, II, 1, 280 ff.

Mullach, _F.Ph.G._, II, 326, fr. 276; cf. Diog. L. vi. 47: τὸν πλούσιον ἀμαθῆ, πρόβατον εἶπε χρυσόμαλλον.

Mullach, II, 302, fr. 27; 327, fr. 285; cf. _infra_ on Teles, for like idea.

Mullach, II, 316, fr. 168; Chrysost. _Homil._ lxiv in Matthew points to Paul’s parallel, I Tim. 6: 10: ῥἰζα γὰρ πάντων τῶν κακῶν ἐστιν ἡ φιλαργυρία.