The state of agriculture in the Italian plains under the Cæsars, is thus set forth by Gibbon:--

"Since the age of Tiberius, _the decay of agriculture had been felt in Italy_; and it was a just subject of complaint that the life of the Roman people depended on the accidents of the winds and the waves. In the division and decline of the empire, the _tributary harvests of Egypt and Africa_ were withdrawn; the numbers of the inhabitants continually diminished with the means of subsistence; and the country was exhausted by the irretrievable losses of war, pestilence, and famine. Pope Gelasius was a subject of Odoacer, and he affirms, with strong exaggeration, that in Emila, Tuscany, and the adjacent provinces, the human species was almost extirpated."[7]

Blackwood's Edinburgh Magazine, Volume 59, No. 368, June 1846 — Part 65

Of the progress and extent of this decay, Gibbon gives the following account in another part of his great work:--

Blackwood's Edinburgh Magazine, Volume 59, No. 368, June 1846 — Part 65

"The agriculture of the Roman provinces was _insensibly ruined_; and in the progress of despotism, which tends to disappoint its own purpose, the emperors were obliged to derive some merit from the forgiveness of debts, or the remission of tributes, which their subjects were utterly incapable of paying. According to the new division of Italy, the fertile and happy province of Campania, the scene of the early victories and of the delicious retirements of the citizens of Rome, extended between the sea and the Apennines, from the Tiber to the Silarius. Within sixty years after the death of Constantine, and on the evidence of an actual survey, an exemption was granted in favour of 330,000 English acres _of desert and uncultivated land, which amounted to one-eighth of the whole surface of the province_. As the footsteps of the barbarians had not yet been seen in Italy, the cause of this amazing desolation, which is recorded in the laws, (Cod. Theod. lxi. t. 38, l. 2,) can be ascribed only to the administration of the Roman emperors."[8]

Blackwood's Edinburgh Magazine, Volume 59, No. 368, June 1846 — Part 65

Michelet observes, in his late profound and able History of France:--

"The Christian emperors could not remedy the growing depopulation of the country, any more than their heathen predecessors. All their efforts only showed the impotence of government to arrest that dreadful evil. Sometimes, alarmed at the depopulation, they tried to mitigate the lot of the farmer, to shield him against the landlord; upon this the proprietor exclaimed he could no longer pay the taxes. At other times they abandoned the farmer, surrendered him to the landlord, and strove to chain him to the soil; but the unhappy cultivators perished or fled, _and the land became deserted_. Even in the time of Augustus, efforts were made to arrest the depopulation at the expense of morals, by encouraging concubinage. Pertinax granted an immunity from taxes to those who could _occupy the desert lands of Italy, to the cultivators of the distant province and the allied kings_. Aurelian did the same. Probus was obliged to transport from Germany men and oxen to cultivate Gaul.[9] Maximian and Constantius transported the Franks and Germans from Picardy and Hainault into Italy; but the depopulation in the towns and the country alike continued. The people surrendered themselves in the fields to despair, as a beast of burden lies down beneath his load and refuses to rise. In vain the emperor strove, by offers of immunities and exemptions, to recall the cultivator to his deserted fields. Nothing, could do so. _The desert extended daily._ At the commencement of the fifth century there was, _in the Happy Campania, the most fertile province of the empire, 520,000 jugera_ (320,000 acres) in a state of nature."[10]