While attempting to estimate the therapeutic value of the bromides from a statistical aspect, one likely source of fallacy must not be overlooked. Most patients, and especially those attending hospitals, are difficult to keep under observation for long periods, more particularly if the progress of the case is unsatisfactory. In this way we may lose sight of those who do not benefit by treatment or who are injured by it. Although it is difficult to estimate these with accuracy, a certain rebatement must always be made on this count in computing results. At the same time we have in the present inquiry positive evidence, in a considerable number of cases, of the innocuous and beneficial nature of the drug, against the negative possibility only of its disadvantages. Of the 141 cases under notice, I only know of three who have died, and all of then of phthisis pulmonalis. The relations existing between the mortality and cause of death on the one hand, and the disease and treatment on the other, the paucity of the data do not permit us to determine.

A further study of the tables would also seem to show that while the beneficial action of the bromides remains permanent, the deleterious effects diminish the longer the drug has been taken. This is doubtless due, as in the case of most poisons, to the system becoming habituated to its use. It has often been observed that the most marked effects of bromism have appeared at the beginning of treatment, and that the eruption, the physical and mental depression, &c., subsequently disappeared, although the medicine was persevered in. Those who have been under its influence for some years rarely present any symptoms directly attributable to the toxic effects of the bromides; and if abnormal conditions do exist, these are the sequelæ of the malady, and not the results of treatment, as shown by the fact that when the last is suspended, the original sufferings are augmented.

A Statistical Inquiry Into the Nature and Treatment of Epilepsy — Part 30

It may be suggested that a prolonged use of the bromides becomes, as in the case of opium, a habit. There is, however, a marked distinction between the two. Opium-smoking is a vice not only deleterious in itself, but one indulged in merely to satisfy a morbid craving. The bromides, on the other hand, are less hurtful in their effects, and are taken to avert the symptoms of a distressing and terrible malady. Assuming, then, that their consumption becomes a necessity, if it can be shown that the results are not serious, while the evils they avert are important, the habit acquired may be looked upon as a justifiable one.

A Statistical Inquiry Into the Nature and Treatment of Epilepsy — Part 30