[556] Professor Bain points out that Mill is occasionally confused by his ignorance of the triple division, intellect, feelings: and will, introduced in the next generation.--_Analysis_, ii. 180 _n._

[559] Also privately printed in 1830. Later editions, edited by Whewell, appeared in 1836, 1862, 1873. I quote the last. See M. Napier's _Correspondence_, pp. 57-59, for the composition.

The English Utilitarians, Volume II (of 3) — Part 158

[561] See Bain's _James Mill_, pp. 374, 415-18.

The English Utilitarians, Volume II (of 3) — Part 158

[562] _Fragment_, pp. 190, 192, 213, 298, 307, 326.

The English Utilitarians, Volume II (of 3) — Part 158

[564] _Ethical Philosophy_ (1873), pp. 188, 193.

[565] M. Napier's _Correspondence_, p. 25.

[571] _Ethical Philosophy_ (Hobbes), pp. 62-64.

[588] _Fragment_, p. 247. Mackintosh quotes Mill's _Analysis_ at p. 197. It had only just appeared.

[593] Cf. Newman's _Apologia_. 'The Catholic Church holds it better for the sun and moon to drop from heaven, for the earth to fail, and for all the millions on it to die of starvation in extremest agony, so far as temporal affliction goes, than that one soul,--I will not say should be lost, but should commit one single venial sin, tell one wilful untruth, or should steal one poor farthing without excuse.' I should steal the farthing and assume the 'excuse.' I confess that I would not only lie, but should think lying right under the supposed circumstances.

[606] At one point, as J. S. Mill notes, he speaks of an 'unsatisfied desire' as a motive, which seems to indicate a present feeling; but this is not his usual view.--_Analysis_, ii. 361, 377 _n._

[607] _Analysis_, ii. 233 _n._ Mill adds that though his father explains the 'intellectual,' he does not explain the 'animal' element in the affections. This, however, is irrelevant for my purpose.

[609] _Analysis_, ii. 292-300; _Fragment_, pp. 247-65. Note Mill's interpretation of this theory of 'praiseworthiness.'--_Analysis_, ii. 298 _n._