Mammonart. An Essay on Economic Interpretation is a book of literary criticism from a Socialist point of view of the traditional "great authors" of Western and American literature (along with a few painters and composers). Mammonart was written by the prolific journalist, novelist and Socialist activist Upton Sinclair, and published in 1925.

Overview

The book is one of the "Dead Hand" series: six books Sinclair wrote on American institutions. The series also includes The Profits of Religion, The Brass Check (journalism), The Goose-step (higher education), The Goslings (elementary and high school education), and Money Writes! (literature). The term "Dead Hand" criticizes Adam Smith's concept that allowing an "invisible hand" of many people's individual self-interests to shape economic relations provides the best result for society as a whole.

Mammonart

Sinclair intended Mammonart to be an alternative "textbook of culture" (p. 384). He says he expected it to soon be used as a textbook in Russian high schools, and hoped that it would be adopted by other European countries after they experienced Socialist revolutions.

Mammonart

In each chapter, Sinclair critiques an artist according to his or her support for the rich and powerful. Most artists do not challenge the status quo and take positions such as 'art for art's sake' or 'art is entertainment.' In Sinclair's view, no matter how beautiful their work, by their passivity such artists perpetuate oppression and inequality.

Mammonart

For example, in the chapter on Shakespeare, entitled "Phosphorence and Decay," Sinclair praises the writer's glorious facility with words; however, this great talent "saved him from thinking." In contrast, Dickens' unique contribution was to "force into aristocratic and exclusive realms of art the revolutionary notion that the poor and degraded are equally as interesting as the rich and respectable."

Mammonart is notable for Sinclair's repeated statement that all art, including his own, is propaganda. The popular distinction between propagandists like Jesus and Tolstoi, and Shakespeare and Goethe, who are "pure and unsullied creative artists ... is purely a class distinction and a class weapon..." (p. 106)

The list of artists discussed is similar, though shorter, to a 1940 list of Great Books. Sinclair also includes writers of lesser importance who were included at the time in the American literary canon.

Artists discussed:

Homer

Aeschylus

Sophocles

Euripides

Aristophanes

Virgil

Horace

Juvenal

Boccaccio

Dante

Miguel de Cervantes

Michelangelo

Raphael

Shakespeare

John Milton

John Bunyan

John Dryden

Pierre Corneille

Jean Racine

Molière

Voltaire

Rousseau

Jonathan Swift

Samuel Richardson

Henry Fielding

Robert Burns

Beethoven

Goethe

Jane Austen

Sir Walter Scott

Samuel Taylor Coleridge

Robert Southey

William Wordsworth

John Keats

Honoré de Balzac

Victor Hugo

Théophile Gautier

Alfred de Musset

George Sand

Flaubert

Heinrich Heine

Richard Wagner

Thomas Carlyle

Alfred Lord Tennyson

Robert Browning

Matthew Arnold

Charles Dickens

William Makepeace Thackeray

John Ruskin

William Morris

Ralph Waldo Emerson

Henry Wadsworth Longfellow

John Greenleaf Whittier

Nathaniel Hawthorne

Edgar Allan Poe

Walt Whitman

Pushkin

Gogol

Turgenev

Dostoievski

Tolstoi

Goncourt brothers

Émile Zola

Guy De Maupassant

Henrik Ibsen

Strindberg

Nietzsche

Emile Verhaeren

Algernon Charles Swinburne

Oscar Wilde

James Abbott McNeill Whistler

George Meredith

Henry James

Mrs. Humphry Ward

Mark Twain

William Dean Howells

Ambrose Bierce

Richard Harding Davis

Stephen Crane

Frank Norris

David Graham Phillips

O. Henry

Jack London

Anatole France

Percy Bysshe Shelley

Mammonart was reprinted in paperback in 2003 by Simon Publications, .

Critical reception

Mammonart was read by undergraduates in the 1920s.

Mammonart has been mostly ignored by critics. Very few reviews are available from online scholarly databases.

Quotations

"All art is propaganda. It is universally and inescapably propaganda; sometimes unconsciously, but often deliberately, propaganda." (p. 9)