The United States blocked a U.N. Security Council resolution Wednesday, demanding a permanent cease-fire in Gaza and the release of Israeli hostages, saying the proposed language would have sent the wrong message to Hamas.
“The United States worked for weeks in good faith to avoid this outcome,” U.S. Deputy U.N. Ambassador Robert Wood said after the vote. “We made clear throughout negotiations, we could not support an unconditional cease-fire that failed to release the hostages, because, as this council has previously called for, a durable end to the war must come with the release of the hostages. These two urgent goals are inextricably linked.”
The U.S. veto was its fourth on Gaza since the war between Israel and Hamas started 14 months ago.
The failed resolution “demands an immediate, unconditional and permanent cease-fire to be respected by all parties; and further reiterates its demand for the immediate and unconditional release of all hostages.”
The text was drafted and put forward by the 10 elected members of the Security Council, who have expressed growing frustration over the past months at the council’s inability to take decisive action to end the war and free the hostages held by Hamas.
Wood said the proposed resolution “would have sent a dangerous message to Hamas: there's no need to come back to the negotiating table.”
“This resolution is trying to restore life, to save lives. It's not a dangerous message,” the Palestinian deputy ambassador Majed Bamya told the council. “The draft resolution is not a dangerous message. This veto is a dangerous message to Israel that it can continue executing its plans — the very plans you oppose — and the messages we send do matter, and that is the wrong message at the worst possible time. Israel is responsible for the Palestinian civilians it kills. It cannot be absolved of that responsibility.”
The Palestinian envoy said that while the proposed cease-fire would not solve everything, it would be a first step and vetoing it is unjustifiable when atrocities are taking place.
“I truly do not understand, you're saying we cannot be for an unconditional cease-fire,” Bamya said, emotion rising in his voice. “What that means, in effect now, is that we are for a war. You're saying we cannot be for an unconditional cease-fire that does not release the hostages. Is this war releasing the hostages? Is it? Is it even trying to release the hostages?”
Israel’s ambassador said the proposed text would have sent the message that terrorists can act with impunity.
“The resolution brought before this chamber was not a path to peace, it was a road map to more terror, more suffering and more bloodshed,” Danny Danon said. “Many of you attempted to pass this injustice. We thank the United States for exercising its veto, for standing on the side of morality and justice, for refusing to abandon the hostages and their families.”
Council members expressed their disappointment that the resolution was not adopted, and Algeria, which represents the Arab group of nations on the 15-nation Security Council, said it would return soon with an even stronger resolution.
“This war represents everything the U.N. Charter stands against. We regret the veto was cast,” said Slovenia’s deputy ambassador Ondina Blokar Drobic.
“Our collective efforts to end the hostilities will not stop,” Guyana’s Ambassador Carolyn Birkett, who led the elected members effort, told reporters after the vote, flanked by her colleagues.
“Once more, the E10 [elected 10 members] is underscoring to the international community, and more importantly to the hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians who continue to bear the cost of these hostilities, including those still held hostage and their loved ones, that we are deeply conscious that the Security Council bears the primary responsibility for the maintenance of international peace and security,” she said.
She said they would continue to try to facilitate council unity, adding “too many lives have already been lost.”
“It is shameful that the United States has once again used the veto to block consensus on a life-saving cease-fire, while they continue to approve deadly arms transfers to fuel the violence and humanitarian catastrophe,” Brenda Moyfa, head of Oxfam’s New York office, said in a statement.
Meanwhile, in Gaza, the war grinds on.
Local health officials said Wednesday a series of Israel attacks killed at least 17 Palestinians in the enclave.
In one attack, an Israeli strike hit a house in the Jabalia area of northern Gaza, killing at least 12 people.