Women's rights demonstration in front of the hospital in Recife, Pernambuco | Image: Denilson Cadete. Used with permission. In mid-August, a 10-year-old rape victim became the center of a debate over abortion rights in Brazil after her name, and the location of the hospital where she was slated to receive a legal abortion was leaked on social media. On August 7, the young girl went to a local São Mateus hospital, in the Brazilian state of Espírito Santo, complaining of abdominal pain where tests confirmed she was pregnant. A week later, Espirito Santo's Court of Justice, authorized the termination of the pregnancy as it was attributed to rape. Article 128 of the Brazilian Penal Code, written in 1940, defines a ‘necessary abortion’ and an ‘abortion in the case of pregnancy resulting from rape’ as exceptions, allowing pregnancy interruptions to be carried out by a doctor without punishment. A Federal Court decision also allows for an abortion when the fetus is anencephalic. According to the girl herself, her uncle began abusing her when she was six and threatened her so she wouldn't tell anyone. The 33-year-old suspect was charged with rape by the State Civil Police and arrested on August 18. Due to the advanced stage of the girl's pregnancy, the hospital in Espirito Santo's capital, Vitoria, claimed then it didn’t have the technical capacity to perform the abortion and the young girl was sent to Recife in the northeastern state of Pernambuco — about 1,600 kilometres away. Between August 16 and 17, an induced miscarriage was carried out at CISAM-UPE hospital which specialises in high-risk pregnancy and women’s assistance. In Brazil, only 42 clinics currently deal with these types of cases, according to the Map of Legal Abortion. Despite efforts made by the authorities to ensure the legal abortion procedure would take place in secrecy, pro-Bolsonaro and extreme-right activist Sara Giromini (also known as Sara Winter) shared the young girl's name and the hospital's address on social media. This prompted a mob of anti-abortion protesters to gather in front of the hospital. On August 16, a judge gave Google (YouTube), Facebook, and Twitter 24 hours to remove content that could be harmful to the 10-year-old girl in question. On August 19, Twitter went on to announce the suspension of Sara Giromini's backup account. Despite Giromini's claims that the child's data was already being shared online, the Public Prosecutor's Office is asking that she pay 1.3 million BRL (around 230,000 US Dollars) in punitive damages. Until the end of 2019, Giromoni held a position in the Bolsonaro government's Woman, Family and Human Rights’ Ministry, which was led by Damares Alves. Alves, who is also an evangelical pastor, followed the child's case closely and sent representatives to Espírito Santo to learn more about the investigations. The Ministry denied leaking any information about the girl. According to a report by journalist Allan de Abreu, following a Ministry trip by the Alves team to São Mateus, anti-abortion proponents began visiting the 10-year-old girl's house in order to pressure her grandmother into stopping the abortion: Após a viagem da equipe do ministério e do deputado estadual a São Mateus, a casa onde a menina morava com a avó virou destino de uma romaria de católicos, evangélicos e políticos bolsonaristas, todos antiaborto. Pressionavam a avó para que ela convencesse a neta a ter a criança. After the ministry's team and a state congressman's trip to São Mateus, the house where the girl lived with her grandmother became a pilgrimage to catholics, evangelicals and bolsonarist politicians, all of them anti-abortion. They pressured the grandmother to convince her granddaughter to have the child. The president of the Brazilian National Conference of Bishops, Walmor Oliveira de Azevedo, called the interruption of the ten-year-old girl's pregnancy a “heinous crime“. On social media, he shared a message saying: A violência sexual é terrível, mas a violência do aborto não se justifica, diante de todos os recursos existentes e colocados à disposição para garantir a vida das duas crianças. As omissões, o silêncio e as vozes que se levantam a favor de tamanha violência exigem uma profunda reflexão sobre a concepção de ser humano. Sexual violence is terrible, but the violence of abortion does not justify it, before all the existing resources made available to ensure the lives of the two children. The omissions, the silence and the voices that raise in favor of such violence demand a deep reflection on the conception of being human.