§ 21. I give a few examples of the three rules stated above.
The following words are properly dissyllabic, in the Prologue to the Canterbury Tales:--(l. 1) _shou-res_, _so-te_; (2) _drogh-te_, _Mar-che_, _per-ced_, _ro-te_; (3) _ba-thed_, _vey-ne_; (5) _swe-te_; (7) _crop-pes_, _yon-ge_, _son-ne_; (8) _half-e_; (9) _sma-le_, _fow-les_, _ma-ken_; (10) _sle-pen_, _o-pen_, _y-ë_; (13) _straun-ge_, _strond-es_; (14) _fer-ne_, _hal-wes_, _lon-des_; (15) _shi-res_, _end-e_; and so on.
In the same way, there are three syllables in (1) _A-pril-le_; (4) _en-gend-red_; (5) _Zéph-i-rús_; (6) _In-spi-red_; (8) _y-ron-ne_; &c. And there are four syllables in (9) _mél-o-dý-ë_; (12) _pil-grim-á-ges_.
Elision takes place of the _e_ in _drogh-te_ and of the _e_ in _couth-e_ in l. 14; of the _e_ in _nyn-e_ in l. 24; &c. In such cases, the words may be read as if spelt _droght_, _couth_, _nyn_, for convenience. There are some cases in which the scribe actually fails to write a final _e_, owing to such elision; but they are not common. I have noted a few in the Glossarial Index.
The final _e_ is ignored, before a consonant, in _were_ (59, 68, 74, 81); and even, which is not common, in _hope_ (88) and _nose_ (152).
As examples of accents to which we are no longer accustomed, we may notice _A-príl-le_ (1); _ver-tú_ (4); _cor-á-ges_ (11); _á-ven-túre_ (25); _tó-ward_ (27); _re-sóun_ (37); _hon-óur_ (46); _hon-óur-ed_ (50); _a-ry´-ve_ (60); _sta-tú-re_ (83); _Cur-téys_ (99).
The lines were recited deliberately, with a distinct pause near the middle of each, at which no elision could take place. At this medial pause there is often a redundant syllable (as is more fully explained in vol. vi). Thus, in l. 3, the _-e_ in _veyn-e_ should be preserved, though modern readers are sure to ignore it. Cf. _carie_ in l. 130; _studie_ in l. 184; &c.
§ 22. By help of the above hints, some notion of the melody of Chaucer may be gained, even by such as adopt the modern English pronunciation. It is right, however, to bear in mind that most of the vowels had, at that time, much the same powers as in modern French and Italian; and it sometimes makes a [xxv] considerable difference. Thus the word _charitable_ in l. 143 was really pronounced more like the modern French _charitable_; only that the initial sound was that of the O. F. and E. _ch_, as in _church_, not that of the modern French _ch_ in _cher_. For further remarks on the pronunciation, see vol. vi.